I recounted My story of having been a healthy, active 6 year old when My partents, believing They were doing the right thing, took Me to get a vaccine for DDT...er..."polio" and the very next day I told My mother, "My bones hurt." (They haven't stopped in 62 years, and the diagnosis eventually was psoriatic arthritis.)
One who was listening said (You guessed it), "Correlation does not equal causation!"
Perhaps not, but... Let's examine the probabilities. What is the likelihood that a happy, healthy child would receive jab o' toxins one day, and just randomly develop psoriatic arthritis the very next day?
I would say the probability that it was just happenstance approaches zero.
Same thing with the illnesses and death in People who were fine before jabs o' toxins entered Their flesh. The probability it is the jabs approaches 100%.
Thank you for sharing. I hope others enjoy reading. Unfortunately I am only able to drop in here briefly to show face and must get back to my latest project. I think I've had my fill of thousands of cases of these causal relationships. They are very compelling and opposed to not being correlationeading to cause. Only a fool would beleive they didn't get ill from a recent biological product introduction. An even bigger fool that convinces his or her patients that there is no relationship. Best wishes solar
“That’s just a coincidence. Correlation doesn’t mean causation.”
“You’re probably just stressed. That can happen.”
Those are the exact words the Doctor used to explain to my youngest sister why she had an non life threatening adverse event after getting the C shot.
She had to call and tell me because I had been warning my siblings that the shots can kill. She thought that was the most ridiculous thing she had ever heard coming from a doctor.
They still don’t believe that it was all done on purpose or that they are actually killing people though.
Thanks for putting words on so many aspects of this subject. I am not biology-chemiistry inclined. I agree with you on all that you said because I believe correlation often shouts out a problem, even in areas where I am a dummy. So I appreciate your words, portrayals, logic; and thank you for putting words on it (far better than I could ever do).
Indeed correlation speaks many things. Without correlation the majority of what humans know now would not be known. It is one of the major key points to discovering anything at all, a process that often cannot be skipped in order to discover. Of course there such things as weak correlations, but noone really goes for weak correlations in reality because they are WEAK signals.
During the height of the death jab rollout many people who appeared at an emergency room shortly after jabs (complaining of serious health injuries) were locked up in psych wards and kept there until they stopped saying they believe their problems were the result of the jabs. This was ACTUALLY happening! It happened to a family member of mine.
Doctors simply refused to run any tests on these people once the victim stated that their symptoms came almost immediately after injection! They called them lunatics and refused to even treat the symptoms, let alone attempt to locate the cause.
If a "fair game" happens in a ballpark, and if a bunch of adverse events happen by attendees of the same event, then the causation also happened in the protracted same event--it is that close, such as metaphorically "in the same ballpark". Research would have to identify the particulars, but correlation and causation go hand in hand. They are not necessarily neighbors; and they may not be house-mates, they are more likely to be bed-mates, doing the same thing in the coincidental same time frame..
Correlation=Causation is merely the combination of awareness and common sense. We have been gaslighted into not believing what we are seeing and being told that common sense has no scientific validity. People who have been trained not to think or act on their own now trust authority (government, medicine) for the "truth" even when that "truth" flies in the face of obvious. The result was that 70% or more of people willing rolled up their sleeves to be jabbed with a bio-weapon. Even today, a significant percent of "sheeple" still believe and trust the "authority", because they no trust their own observations or ability to think logically. Karl, thank you for all you do for your fellow human beings.
Unfortunately all these claims of protits and pleomorphic bacterial forms have been solidly debunked. They were never proven in science and have since been explored using correct methods.
It is sad. And yet he we are being told like children that toxins in your circulatory system cannot act in 15 mins. That is not science that is brain washing. Maybe that doctor should inject neurotoxins in his arm at a descent dose and see if they ont hit him in 15 mins. They likely will and that is evidence of the lie right there. Chemistry acts fast in ome cases and is quickly distributed around the body. I'm sorry to hear someone made it to the great age of 104 and then had health success destroyed by a weapon.
I recounted My story of having been a healthy, active 6 year old when My partents, believing They were doing the right thing, took Me to get a vaccine for DDT...er..."polio" and the very next day I told My mother, "My bones hurt." (They haven't stopped in 62 years, and the diagnosis eventually was psoriatic arthritis.)
One who was listening said (You guessed it), "Correlation does not equal causation!"
Perhaps not, but... Let's examine the probabilities. What is the likelihood that a happy, healthy child would receive jab o' toxins one day, and just randomly develop psoriatic arthritis the very next day?
I would say the probability that it was just happenstance approaches zero.
Same thing with the illnesses and death in People who were fine before jabs o' toxins entered Their flesh. The probability it is the jabs approaches 100%.
My story if You're interested:
Why I Am This Unspeakable Thing (video, 5 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/why-i-am-this-unspeakable-thing-5:8
Thank you for sharing. I hope others enjoy reading. Unfortunately I am only able to drop in here briefly to show face and must get back to my latest project. I think I've had my fill of thousands of cases of these causal relationships. They are very compelling and opposed to not being correlationeading to cause. Only a fool would beleive they didn't get ill from a recent biological product introduction. An even bigger fool that convinces his or her patients that there is no relationship. Best wishes solar
Love always! And may Your project emerge in glory!
“That’s just a coincidence. Correlation doesn’t mean causation.”
“You’re probably just stressed. That can happen.”
Those are the exact words the Doctor used to explain to my youngest sister why she had an non life threatening adverse event after getting the C shot.
She had to call and tell me because I had been warning my siblings that the shots can kill. She thought that was the most ridiculous thing she had ever heard coming from a doctor.
They still don’t believe that it was all done on purpose or that they are actually killing people though.
Truly mind boggling !!!
Thanks for putting words on so many aspects of this subject. I am not biology-chemiistry inclined. I agree with you on all that you said because I believe correlation often shouts out a problem, even in areas where I am a dummy. So I appreciate your words, portrayals, logic; and thank you for putting words on it (far better than I could ever do).
Indeed correlation speaks many things. Without correlation the majority of what humans know now would not be known. It is one of the major key points to discovering anything at all, a process that often cannot be skipped in order to discover. Of course there such things as weak correlations, but noone really goes for weak correlations in reality because they are WEAK signals.
The world is going mad egh
During the height of the death jab rollout many people who appeared at an emergency room shortly after jabs (complaining of serious health injuries) were locked up in psych wards and kept there until they stopped saying they believe their problems were the result of the jabs. This was ACTUALLY happening! It happened to a family member of mine.
Doctors simply refused to run any tests on these people once the victim stated that their symptoms came almost immediately after injection! They called them lunatics and refused to even treat the symptoms, let alone attempt to locate the cause.
"The Antithesis Of Commonsense, Facts and Reality"....by A.Fauci
A failed clown who trades only in the power of a Lie.
If only there truly were such a thing as "viruses" and commonsense,
reason and self worth - went viral, became infectious and SPREAD
I too am very grateful Jamie Andrews conscientiously shreds these Lies
and their seeds.
Neat concise clear study, Ai !!
Oh...and you too, Karl C 💕
If a "fair game" happens in a ballpark, and if a bunch of adverse events happen by attendees of the same event, then the causation also happened in the protracted same event--it is that close, such as metaphorically "in the same ballpark". Research would have to identify the particulars, but correlation and causation go hand in hand. They are not necessarily neighbors; and they may not be house-mates, they are more likely to be bed-mates, doing the same thing in the coincidental same time frame..
Correlation=Causation is merely the combination of awareness and common sense. We have been gaslighted into not believing what we are seeing and being told that common sense has no scientific validity. People who have been trained not to think or act on their own now trust authority (government, medicine) for the "truth" even when that "truth" flies in the face of obvious. The result was that 70% or more of people willing rolled up their sleeves to be jabbed with a bio-weapon. Even today, a significant percent of "sheeple" still believe and trust the "authority", because they no trust their own observations or ability to think logically. Karl, thank you for all you do for your fellow human beings.
Chemical and technological analysis of biochips reported by Dr. David Nixon (to whose work you have contributed):
[en] Dr. Diana Wojtkowiak: Summary - Study of Biochips Found in Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccines
http://grypa666.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Wojtkowiak-summary-biochips.pdf
About AIEnhancement:
https://anitabaxasmd.substack.com/p/who-is-right-holograms-symplasts-55a/comment/107958436
Prof. Baxas on types of particles in darkfield microscopy:
https://anitabaxasmd.substack.com/p/who-is-right-holograms-symplasts-55a/
Unfortunately all these claims of protits and pleomorphic bacterial forms have been solidly debunked. They were never proven in science and have since been explored using correct methods.
Baxas is aware, wrote the article to reconcile divisions that thwart the research. Did she misclassify some structures, which ones?
It is sad. And yet he we are being told like children that toxins in your circulatory system cannot act in 15 mins. That is not science that is brain washing. Maybe that doctor should inject neurotoxins in his arm at a descent dose and see if they ont hit him in 15 mins. They likely will and that is evidence of the lie right there. Chemistry acts fast in ome cases and is quickly distributed around the body. I'm sorry to hear someone made it to the great age of 104 and then had health success destroyed by a weapon.