I've seen "inside body" pictures referred to as fibrotic. I am making in my weak mind a nave assumption that maybe the scaffolding you refer to is similar to the beginnings of a fibrosis. If so, maybe the rest of it would have its own biofilm protection in the body. I've seen white fibers pictured around a heart. I've seen inches-long mortician fibers pulled out of cadavers. I do recognize that my questioning hunch could be anything; but I find it bothersome that something may be growing (from shedding) inside Pfizer/Moderna unvaccinated (me); though unfortunately 34 years ago I got 23 shots in 6 needles in one hour; and two were on A MIDWEST DOCTOR's worst ever shots Article List (anthrax and smallpox). Those shots were pre-combat deployment shots. I love your site. Thanks
Oh wow, you got the tank pack there. Glad you are still with us 😁 well synthetic tissues use fibrous scaffolds and often use amyloids to form biomimetic tissues. See the crossover there, it explains the dual use language and why doctors haven't twigged that synthetic is the answer not normal pathology. Thank you so much for supporting ✌️
Being generous and positive, -- and on the basis that a broken clock is correct 2 x a day, who knows, its probably unlikely she may stumble across/steal something of use!
Stay positive Karl, ignore these characters and keep up your good work.
It is interesting though, that I'm noticing more posts and articles on nanotech, the internet of biothings, near body area networks, contaminated mRNA vaccines.
--perhaps that is why the Govts want to censor the internet and 'disinformation', which no-doubt they will try to classify your fine work under!
No I think/ hope it's just a coincidence. I have followed her for quite a while and she posted this on her substack just a few days ago, which is probably why you have received lots of referrals.
I hope it's the case that we, as a group, are all reading what we can, learning what we can, from whoever seems to be doing good work and study.
--But hey, we can all be wrong!
Also,
In one of Judy Mikovitz ( yep sceptical about her too) she mentioned a substance Suramin- maybe worth an investigation?
Also I cant remember who but he was a civilian researcher, he was studying sodium citrate as a binding agent but I was skeptical as to its efficacy in removal
Are there any other credible researchers you know about? Thank you for this info. I cant stand the deception and it's convoluted absolutely fuking everything
Unfortunately i think the only other credible researchers are clifford carnicom, dr arnie berkhardt, dr spieker possibly, and several others who have been surpressed or dissapeared. The small media folk and go nowhere researchers in the lime light seem to all be the equivelent of mainsyream media missinformatiin and distraction at the social media and awake interface level. Many havr started to figure this out. The fake saviours was always a threat as the fall of the cabal series warned in the last episode. The noise wouldd become loud and the truth burried in that haystack.
Thanks a lot for sharing some of your videos again. They are, as always, impressive and at the same time chilling! The video of 2:22 in particular really impressed me: that circular structure that doesn’t behave like a bubble or a cell, and just before the kind of ‘explosion’ or ‘germination’ you can already see another filamentous growth starting. Then watching an entire network suddenly emerge from that nucleus is truly striking.
In another video there are also filaments with a very unusual morphology, almost like drops linked together in a chain, which makes the impression of a directed self-assembly process even stronger. It’s interesting to compare both forms: on the one hand, the more rectilinear and continuous filaments in the 2:22 video, and on the other, these ‘beaded’ chains that look like modular assemblies. Two different manifestations, but possibly of the same underlying self-organizing process in blood. However, they don’t seem to be the same type as the ones I find in my cat’s blood.
It would be great if you could get hold of some spectrometry equipment to complement these observations!
That’s wonderful news! I’m really glad to hear it and I look forward eagerly to the results you’ll get with that new machine. Is it a spectrometer? That would be fantastic, as I’m sure it could provide key insights into the composition and behaviour of those vesicles, filaments, and other strange artefacts that are increasingly being found in blood.
Major mechanisms and specific behaviours are confirmed, spectrometry will strengthen those results. Bit so far it likely isnt needed to make the tangible arguement. But scientific framing is certainly more profound aided by wave numbers.
Very interesting what you say. Although, in my view, without knowing the exact composition of the materials there is still a key element missing to make the argument as strong as it needs to be. I think spectrometry may be essential to take that step
to see the exact composition yes. But my recent work shows the hydrogels with appropriate dye and you can even see the aggregations where active assembly is occurring in the localized areas. Nothing about it is not a hydrogel, It can only be that. You'll see soon ;)
What I keep asking myself is: hydrogels, yes… but made of what materials exactly? That’s the key, because without that answer it’s very hard to understand their real properties or even to think about how they might be neutralised.
Hi Ian, I can't help but feel there is a strange advertising campaign going on to usher people towards Dr Ana. I've had several messages almost exactly the same as yours posted just in a short recent space. It doesn't seem normal, am I mistaken? If so I appolagize sincerely. If not I can te you that for very good reasons I don't associate myself to Ana. Nothing she has claimed or reported has contributed to my understanding of this material.
A brilliant recording of the "directed evolution" from Homo sapiens to Nano sapiens.
love the open source writeup. marked for when I've got adequate resources to implement it, thank you very much.
You are welcome dude!
Hello Karl!
Wow! Truly amazing!
You always pique my curiosity with your incredible micrographs and videos.
Looking forward to see your final work and answers to what they’ve put into our bodies.
I hope people will generously support your incessant efforts to share your findings.
Keep going, Mate! ❤️
AGAIN. THE RECORD SPEAKS FOR ITSELF..... THANKS FOR YOUR PROFOUND WORK...
I've seen "inside body" pictures referred to as fibrotic. I am making in my weak mind a nave assumption that maybe the scaffolding you refer to is similar to the beginnings of a fibrosis. If so, maybe the rest of it would have its own biofilm protection in the body. I've seen white fibers pictured around a heart. I've seen inches-long mortician fibers pulled out of cadavers. I do recognize that my questioning hunch could be anything; but I find it bothersome that something may be growing (from shedding) inside Pfizer/Moderna unvaccinated (me); though unfortunately 34 years ago I got 23 shots in 6 needles in one hour; and two were on A MIDWEST DOCTOR's worst ever shots Article List (anthrax and smallpox). Those shots were pre-combat deployment shots. I love your site. Thanks
Oh wow, you got the tank pack there. Glad you are still with us 😁 well synthetic tissues use fibrous scaffolds and often use amyloids to form biomimetic tissues. See the crossover there, it explains the dual use language and why doctors haven't twigged that synthetic is the answer not normal pathology. Thank you so much for supporting ✌️
THANKS!!! That inspired a donation. You deserve it!
Aww, so sweet thank you! Daisy! Love your heart.
Following along, feeling unsure...but still following. Thank you Karl 🥰
Thanks!
I read the host DNA gets taken over by synthetic DNA until there is no more host DNA, it's all synthetic, & no human can stop it.
Is this true?
I couldnt tell you from my work since i do no genetic seqeuncing. However i have had same concerns.
Hi Karl
Thanks for the heads-up.
I don't contribute to her in any way.
Being generous and positive, -- and on the basis that a broken clock is correct 2 x a day, who knows, its probably unlikely she may stumble across/steal something of use!
Stay positive Karl, ignore these characters and keep up your good work.
It is interesting though, that I'm noticing more posts and articles on nanotech, the internet of biothings, near body area networks, contaminated mRNA vaccines.
--perhaps that is why the Govts want to censor the internet and 'disinformation', which no-doubt they will try to classify your fine work under!
Best regards
Ian
It is exactly why they want to. If everyone knee the truth it would explain why everything is the way it is now, as you mention.
Hi Karl
No I think/ hope it's just a coincidence. I have followed her for quite a while and she posted this on her substack just a few days ago, which is probably why you have received lots of referrals.
I hope it's the case that we, as a group, are all reading what we can, learning what we can, from whoever seems to be doing good work and study.
--But hey, we can all be wrong!
Also,
In one of Judy Mikovitz ( yep sceptical about her too) she mentioned a substance Suramin- maybe worth an investigation?
All the very best Karl.
Ian
Also I cant remember who but he was a civilian researcher, he was studying sodium citrate as a binding agent but I was skeptical as to its efficacy in removal
Are there any other credible researchers you know about? Thank you for this info. I cant stand the deception and it's convoluted absolutely fuking everything
Unfortunately i think the only other credible researchers are clifford carnicom, dr arnie berkhardt, dr spieker possibly, and several others who have been surpressed or dissapeared. The small media folk and go nowhere researchers in the lime light seem to all be the equivelent of mainsyream media missinformatiin and distraction at the social media and awake interface level. Many havr started to figure this out. The fake saviours was always a threat as the fall of the cabal series warned in the last episode. The noise wouldd become loud and the truth burried in that haystack.
Ian sorry
Thanks a lot for sharing some of your videos again. They are, as always, impressive and at the same time chilling! The video of 2:22 in particular really impressed me: that circular structure that doesn’t behave like a bubble or a cell, and just before the kind of ‘explosion’ or ‘germination’ you can already see another filamentous growth starting. Then watching an entire network suddenly emerge from that nucleus is truly striking.
In another video there are also filaments with a very unusual morphology, almost like drops linked together in a chain, which makes the impression of a directed self-assembly process even stronger. It’s interesting to compare both forms: on the one hand, the more rectilinear and continuous filaments in the 2:22 video, and on the other, these ‘beaded’ chains that look like modular assemblies. Two different manifestations, but possibly of the same underlying self-organizing process in blood. However, they don’t seem to be the same type as the ones I find in my cat’s blood.
It would be great if you could get hold of some spectrometry equipment to complement these observations!
Hopefully a new machine may be en route! Locally. But the vesicles can vary behavior in different conditions. Thanks Cristina
That’s wonderful news! I’m really glad to hear it and I look forward eagerly to the results you’ll get with that new machine. Is it a spectrometer? That would be fantastic, as I’m sure it could provide key insights into the composition and behaviour of those vesicles, filaments, and other strange artefacts that are increasingly being found in blood.
Major mechanisms and specific behaviours are confirmed, spectrometry will strengthen those results. Bit so far it likely isnt needed to make the tangible arguement. But scientific framing is certainly more profound aided by wave numbers.
Very interesting what you say. Although, in my view, without knowing the exact composition of the materials there is still a key element missing to make the argument as strong as it needs to be. I think spectrometry may be essential to take that step
to see the exact composition yes. But my recent work shows the hydrogels with appropriate dye and you can even see the aggregations where active assembly is occurring in the localized areas. Nothing about it is not a hydrogel, It can only be that. You'll see soon ;)
What I keep asking myself is: hydrogels, yes… but made of what materials exactly? That’s the key, because without that answer it’s very hard to understand their real properties or even to think about how they might be neutralised.
Hi Karl are you aware of this lady ? She is reporting similar and mentions using UDCA
https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/study-of-biochips-found-in-covid?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Hi Ian, I can't help but feel there is a strange advertising campaign going on to usher people towards Dr Ana. I've had several messages almost exactly the same as yours posted just in a short recent space. It doesn't seem normal, am I mistaken? If so I appolagize sincerely. If not I can te you that for very good reasons I don't associate myself to Ana. Nothing she has claimed or reported has contributed to my understanding of this material.
Thanks