Interesting stuff Karl, thank you. 1Khz is about where the fundamentals of the human voice sit BTW. I think this hands on approach to experimentation is the way forward.. all power to you mate.
What do you mean? The voice? When humans vocal chords 'make sound' they're not emitting anything at all.. You're setting up standing waves in the oxygen and nitrogen which makes up the air.. Sound is not an emission it's a disturbance of the medium only. Why no sound in space because the medium is missing.. Why no weight in space because magnetism or gravity gets weaker as you leave large objects with acceleration to a null pressure gradient!
Yes, but when those parameters are in place you end up with measurable sounds waves! That's the essential part here on the ground. I passed on the space holiday package due to them not having any live music on the trip. 🤣
Calm down. You are getting all wound up over a point I never made. I largely agree with what you are saying... no need to get your knickers in a twist.
have you read about aether? Where Michelson-Morley and Einstein (general theory of relativity) both state that a 'medium' must exist for the propagation of various 'forms' see:
In reference [3], Einstein states "Recapitulating, we may say that according to the General Theory of Relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an Aether. According to the General Theory of Relativity space without Aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light,"
I'm impressed Karl, and thankful that someone is taking frequence modulation seriously. Of course finding the optimal frequency for the elimination of the foreign substances, is like finding a needle in a stack of needles.
In my opinion a good starting place would be to identify the frequency output of the target elements. Match those frequencies and adjust the intensity of the signal and pulse rate. My concern is that partial destruction of these elements may release the contents (pay load)
Yes, I agree that finding the frequency and matching it might be a good starting point, but that is for biological function interruption so I wonder if this won't work for these structures since they technically aren't biological, with biological function. I wonder if anyone can muscle test this.
Most of these materials which merge with your own are largely biological to be compatible with you. Maybe a portion that is not. But so far it seems most of the material and changes comes under that of advanced nano biology. But we only know so much.
Okay Karl can you stretch my brain a bit in regards to both lines of comments above and below: the understanding of us and everything which exists that we perceive...is the case of electrical energy resonating at
a specific rate/variable responsible for defining all these forms in the first place - as is widely understood to be the explanation? and if so....is this measure of electrical energy the same as or utterly different from speaking of ranges of frequencies? ie are these completely different expressions, electrical energies vs frequency ranges? i tend to think they are but don't they come close to being the same in some way?? feeling stupid today, but this is interesting to me 😒KK
Amplitude/energy amount and frequency need to be considered separately to manipulate matter effectively. So which frequency resonates with which molecules and how much is needed to destroy or benefit that molecule the way you want.
Actually Jessica, everything has a resonant frequency not just biological life forms. They also have tolerance levels. Thank about a crystal glass being shattered by an opera singer.
Yes, I'm aware, but thinking it's more along the lines of your second comment, about tolerance levels. Matching the frequency may or may not work for something like this. We just don't know, right? Because it isn't biological and may not respond in the same way. It's definitely a good starting point though, if you have a way of finding that frequency. Do you know anyone who is really good at muscle testing?
Oh it is biological, it is biomimetic material. This could even be a worse problem if the destructive frequencies are the same as that you have for lipids, biological material, etc.
Frequencies don't harm healthy tissue and organs, in fact, matching frequencies of biological material is supportive of it, like homeopathic sarcodes or a form of entrainment.
Absolutely and completely wrong. The government use the same formula for DEWS. It's even on the federal gov site somewhere, the Japanese formula for resonant destructive frequencies is how they ccukate frequencies to target and damage solid or biological matter but faster and with instant effects. I posted in David's private chat group a list of papers showing DNA damage from , RF, emf, and elf. So no, this statement couldn't be further from the truth. That's why RIFE himself quoted frequencies at that time he knew we're damaging. I'm not sure where you got that info from but whoever is touting that shouldn't be. Frequency CAN be extremely dangerous and damaging in endless ways. It also manipulates molecules or gases. Not meaning to knock you, just correcting this statement since someone could be harmed by this information if brave enough to make devices they do not understand.
Also a cell has more than one resonant frequency since they are made from various molecules, each having a different property. There is often not one resonant F. Pick the wrongs ones and output enough energy you will destroy the cell. See other comment.
Happy to see you giving frequencies a try. They will be the wave of the future more and more in the medical realm. Big pHARMas toxic drugs will go down in history as the biggest scam played in the people of the world. Don’t get me wrong, it has its place in medical emergencies.
It’s been quite a while, but I know I had suggested Spooky2 frequency generators. There is a group on Telegram called Spooky2 unofficial where there are several people that are pro’s at the frequencies. One in particular has fixed the frequency programs that weren’t functioning properly in the computer program. Like the Covid spike protein. The program is meant to destroy it. But it wasn’t working well. So he fixed it. Now it’s working well and helping people suffering with long Covid due to the spike proteins. I can get you his name if you are interested.
As far as i can tell the profiles added to spooky2 list were not based on anything at all. They have the DNA devices which cannot do what they claimed too. I borrowed the spooky with phanatron tube in the lab a while back. To my surprise it wasn't outputting what I expect proper RIFE to output on the oscilloscope at all. and it does this weird pulsing which a RIFE machine shouldn't do, i have no idea why they would use a pulse or the weird output i saw. If you want a real RIFE machine i would suggest looking at the MOPA valve amplifier and GB4000 generator. Many have said these are superior and closer to a real RIFE machine than a spooky. For me, the spooky is a novelty and i know that many people who tried to produce a proper RIFE machine which follows the original design have previously been shutdown, put out of business or went missing. I feel like they dont care about spooky2 and their large sales base for a reason. RIFE must function with the proper side-bands on a correctly modulated carrier signal. Ideally it was shown that a good RIFE machine needs to be around 600-900watts RF power and the spooky doesn't even come close. It wastes half its cycle pulsing. That means if a session was going to take 4 hours it would need to take 8 now to achieve what a constant phanatron signal would do. All in all, the spooky2 I personally rate as a novelty device. Their DNA repair think where you place samples on it or your finger in it is an absolute con. It doesn't even have the quality of op-amplifiers on the circuit which would be capable of doing such and it certainly doesn't have any advanced processing chips to process the signal. Its a pseudo science device, like the blue-shield EMF devices. expensive, and empty inside, but people fall for it. If i were to use RIFE in the future I would design my own.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and experiences with our Spooky2 devices. We appreciate all feedback, as it helps us continuously improve our products and offerings.
We understand that there are various products on the market, and the Rife technology landscape can be complex. We strive to provide a device that balances affordability, functionality, and accessibility.
Regarding your observations about the output and behaviour of the Spooky2 systems, we want to assure you that our engineering team is dedicated to ensuring the effectiveness and reliability of our products.
While we acknowledge differing opinions on our products, we are proud of the positive feedback and success stories shared by many users who have found value in Spooky2 in their wellness journeys. We encourage open discussions and would be glad to engage further about specific concerns or suggestions you have about improvements.
My concerns would be that the amplifier for the phanatron tube is far to weak to damage a large range of pathogens, that the tube is off for 50% time, and that some of the nano frequencies and and other profiles came out before researchers new anything about the nanomaterials in our body or their type. That seemed highly suspect. Also the waveform patterns were od. Nearly all science studies and trials back RIFE's early design parameters and show issues with the concept behind the spooky profile of function. The 40watts output part for me is a major attribute to how it's not possible to destroy a long list of pathogens with. I've had several friends sell their spooky because after a while they realised it wasnt curing their disease despite feeling different at first. I honestly don't know if that bit is placebo or a Pemf like charging benefit of cells. Maybe up the spooky central power output to a reasonable value between 100 to 500w, remove the pulsing, and correct the waveform output. Documentation does indeed show that is how an effective rife machine is made and that is what I would buy. If it tests could on the oscilloscope and meets that criteria I know it is a rife machine I want. And I do want one lol.
I appreciate your detailed feedback. Regarding your concerns about the amplifier strength, I'd like to point out that the output power and waveform settings can be adjusted by the user within our software. However, because plasma energy is quite powerful, and the settings require a certain level of understanding of RIFE theory, we have default configurations in our official software to ensure optimal performance for users at all experience levels.
We strive to balance accessibility with effective treatment, which is why we've chosen these standardized settings. Additionally, many users have reported positive results, which speaks to the effectiveness of our product when used correctly.
I understand that experiences can vary, and it's vital to have confidence in the tools you choose. We're continuously working to refine our products based on feedback from our community.
I am confused about the power rating part. Regardless of the settings you have put in for safety, it doesn't change the science. If much more than 40watts output is said to be required for a large range of pathogens and the spooky doesn't have that ability then how is the above situation you mentioned making any difference to requirements to kill pathogens which are known to be needed for many. If the Unit cant output more than 40watts, then that is a massive technical issue already. I think most will agree that the above statement begins to sound like a sales tactic since it disregards the obvious issue and babbles around it. The unit amplifier is capable of no more than 40watts maximum leaving it 60-500watts plus short of being able to destroy many pathogens in lab settings. There is no magic that will escape this fact. In fact i was rather shocked the CENTRAL amplifier was huge and weighed nothing at all. I figured that maybe it had a switch mode digital amplifier inside until i saw it only has 40watts (big box for nothing), but i know digital amps are actually not very good for RIFE frequency production because of switching on the transistors. I think what I am explaining is that spooky doesn't meet the technical requirements of any proven RIFE based lab experiments in history, and that cant be ignored if one understands these things. The criteria must be met or they do not work as intended. 40 watts is a joke when looking at proper RIFE devices. The only people I know who build proper RIFE devices and tried to sell them ended up dead or targeted like RIFE's associates such as Hoyland who tried to manufacture them in his own image and who designed the Hoyland wave concept. There are RF machines not sold as RIFE but essentially the same, but they are sold for different purposes and lab experiments. Spooky is the only company i know of that has done so well by not even following the science on RIFE and what was already known. There is very little left to learn about RIFE and how to optimize it, But many will claim a unique twist on a very simple technology. That is where you can fool the public, but you can fool an engineer who has studied into these sciences. The other thing is that I didn't realize my Substack was a SPOOKY feedback hub, lol. feels kind of weird lol its fine, and i am joking of course. It is nice to meet you and I am sure you are vested in the company that pays you, but i am pretty good at tearing down machines, and pseudo science in order to find things that actually work. For me, after also using a spooky and having a look around it, I rate it as overpriced trickery. The DNA correcting tools they sell as an option are complete pseudo science and they could never explain how it works or why they claimed it could knowing it hasn't even got any such hardware to do so inside of those devices. If i were you i wouldnt ask too many questions at work, they might not like it because they dont have answers. Therefore, it shows that at least some products spooky sell are trickery based on science concepts that do not exist or have not been proven anywhere. And they certainly cant be proven in a DNA device which has cheap, low grade, low bandwidth op-amps, no powerful processing circuitry, that is called conning people in my book. sorry, but no escaping reality there. Why an earth did spooky make cooky devices like that which they had to of known were not able to do what they were sold to. Just nuts. I was offered a whole load of REAL RIFE equipment which was custom designed by a widowed woman last year. I couldn't afford the shipping of his workshop and all the devices. Those were REAL RIFE machines and had massive RF amplifiers to drive all the equipment, because that is what is required !!!!!!!!! not an empty 40watt box by spooky
Nice, reminds me of Hulda Clark. That would be perfect to find the right frquence. Hula took a bacteria, then testet its frequency and then mad the same freq. to kill it.
It is a method even RIFE himself used. Today we have complex formulas if the material is known and then we can test that frequency to save time. I have some cheat methods inline too. see what happens.
You can literally FIND the right frequency for those of us with boots on the ground in the frequency field, so we can help people heal from this. I suspect it may be something we would need to use at least weekly or with exposure, at minimum. If we have the right frequency sets, we can program them into our devices (for me the GB4000 with MOPA). I am stoked and can't wait to see what you find. I hope your equipment can go high enough to find a solution.
With this software you can manipulate wave forms and amplitudes. Go to the Setting tab to review options. Also, in the Programs tab search for key words like Covid and see what existing programs come up. The data base has 55K programs. They add new programs ongoing. You can set up and select and run a program on the virtual generator located on the Control tab in the lower left hand corner (VG). Once you have the program running you can observe the frequencies used and see the respective wave forms in the Settings tab. I've been using this for several years and it really works for detox and health issues. It's worth a look.
Yea actually, there is a few other pc aps too. Unfortunately the pc apps only go to the sound card spectrum. I had the spooky app before I even got to use a spooky. But yes I could try some of their frequencies. Will need a modulating circuit to have two function generators working as a wave on a carrier frequency. I did try the nano programs on the spooky2 setup before and didn't notice anything. I wonder what those frequencies were now, since I know likely ranges as charted above, plus others from papers. Should be interesting. Will look for a modulator and another wave generator of scientific grade.
I am using a Siglent SDG810 waveform generator to modulate a Hulda Clark 30KHz square wave onto a 3MHz sine wave carrier. The 3MHz carrier allows the square wave to penetrate deeper into the tissues. Two years ago, I confirmed using before-and-after testing that it eliminates parasites from my body: I asked a voll meter practitioner to test me for parasites; he detected two parasites (ascara and, if I remember correctly, fasciolopsis buski); I used the SDG810 by following Hulda Clark's zapper protocol (three 7-minute sessions with 20 minutes off between sessions). After the SDG810 treatment, my voll meter practitioner tested me again and said the parasites were gone. The SDG810 works!
Interesting, I've done a lot of research into biofields and frequency based science in medicine. The voll machine though, in multiple studies was shown to be hugely innacurrate with massive fundamental issues. Most papers Concluded that using these methods they could not correlate reliable results to a known pathogen. Another study showed the flaws in using the device and how it was applied. Another study showed that almost each time the results were different, another claimed it seemed to be able to show some kind of signal which may have been the parasite but it would reference the wrong kind and not be consistent either. My understanding is that the software and hardware at that time were not complex enough to be able to feedback this kind of information accurately. The software would have to have complex math functions to deduct, filter, and clean up these signals to be accurate. One of the design issues here is the very low signal levels and massive noise floors from everything else giving off it's unique signatures. Those with engineering experience will know this is no simple stuff. Not impossible, never, but had the voll meters used this level of complexity? Absolutely not, and without known databases before the device was created it would have been very confusing to work out how he machine would work. A single point reading from the body seriously limits any ability to locate the said issue reliably. Cell phone towers use triangulation to locate things and a similar methods wod have increased accuracy with others.
Medical researchers of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus used to lead in this field and this kind of healing became official treatment in the USSR. I don't know if it survived in westernized Russia. There is a meta-study report on microwavenews website, 20 or 25 years old if I recall, which sums up state of the science & art in that field. English translation, very useful for general study of emf, the main subject of that report.
On another note, the establishment pushes emf as underlying mechanism of life, but according to some experts in advanced physics, torsion field (TF) particles are responsible in our bodies and all living things for regulating health. They rush at speeds the multiple of lightspeed along "singalling paths" brain to organs to keep us healthy. The particles being of atomic and subatomic size, perhaps they would affect nanotech? Since TFs exist paralel with emf and have far greater reach, while you are using emf gadgets, I wonder how much of the observed effects are due to the TF. Perhaps screening emf of the gadgets (possible?) would reveal if your observed effects change or vanish.
Hulda Clark discovered, quite by accident, that a 30KHz square wave killed ALL viruses, bacteria, parasites, mold and fungus. Once she discovered this, she stopped using sine waves. A sine wave has to be tuned to the resonant frequency of the microorganism being targeted, whereas a 30KHz square wave kills all microorganisms regardless of their resonant frequencies. She speculated that it was the enormous quantity of harmonics generated by the square wave that enabled it to target such a broad range of resonant frequencies. Her book The Cure For All Diseases discusses this, and provides the schematic diagram of the 9 volt square wave generator (zapper) built for her by her son Geoff Clark using a 555 timer chip. It has to be a pulsed DC square wave, i.e., 0V to +9V, not -4.5V to +4.5V. The latter is not effective at killing microorganisms, she found.
My function generator does offer a ttl output. TTL signals are 0 to 5v logic signals. These signals are also easier to amplify with simpler amplifier designs. No need for a bipolar design which means you can almlst use a single logic mosfet with larger power supply. Will give it a go. But might be a problem testing microscopically since charged material will end up at one contact from single direction flow.
Jessica, have you heard of the hypothesis that it's the information about a pathogen structure received by a living organism via torsion field particles which causes a reaction as if the organism was exposed to the real pathogen? Apparently, Montagnier, a French Nobilist, has proven it experimantally, got a Nobel price for it, and another (Russian?) scientist replicated the result with different means of remotely sending the torsion particle info.
can you find a paper for it? the only information i found about certain claims with torsion fields honestly didn't make any sense. Someone sent me an old paper too which almost looked genuine, but the paper failed to show any evidence of the claim by the end. It was almost like smoke and mirrors. so if there is a paper and a nobble-prize for it id love to see more.
Yes, in fact, it ws just explained the movie that aired yesterday on the CHD website called, "Introducing Homeopathy." They explained his experiments in depth. I don't know when it will be offered again for viewing.
I had found that info years ago when I was researching why kids with PANDAS can respond instantly to a strep "carrier" and they didn't need an incubation period to react. It really aligns with the concepts around homeopathy. I am a homeopath and a frequency healer, so I see imprints of old "trauma" and bugs responding to frequencies all the time.
Pls link the movie, Jessica. The following is also for Karl's comment above. I 've translated to English a paper from former Soviet medical-physical institute which performs research & clinical trials in torsion field applications. I lost this and other professional material when my blog was destroyed Oct 2023.
From memory, they found on several hepatitis patients that instead of a year or so of treatment with expensive Western medication, the patients recovered at significantly higher rate within up to a few weeks. The method involves the drug and a TF beam goes thru it aimed at the patient's liver if I recall.
The paper shows simple equipment put together for the purpose. Karl could do it, no problem :)
Montagnier's experiment:
"Radionic methods make possible more ambitious projects of transmitting whole genes by radiofrequency links, and transferring them to living organisms for gene therapy, or, on the contrary, for selective covert murder, depending on the implementer. Let’s not expect the military to busy themselves with gene therapy. Torsion field particles make possible copying, in the form of torsion field, DNA’s original chemical form. Transfer of the particles to human body causes cheating of natural mechanisms and re-construction of the transferred DNA in cells.
The first succesful reproduction of DNA from a torsion field signal sent over the Internet accomplished Nobel Prize winner, Luc Montagnier..."
Where can I find the storage cabinet with plastic drawers in the photo behind your microscope? Am looking for a cabinet exactly like that to store small parts.
Several places sell those. They are cheap on aces like amazon quite often. Parts bin, parts drawers is often a common term. I used to have loads of them full of components going around every wall. So yes, very helpful!
Or recycle small or big, plastic or glass jars with lids, placed in boxes or chest of drawers you like and have available. My wife neatly reduced clutter with sawing supplies this wat, to my relief :) Then I stole the idea and have like storage and collections for most everything smallish.
Interesting stuff Karl, thank you. 1Khz is about where the fundamentals of the human voice sit BTW. I think this hands on approach to experimentation is the way forward.. all power to you mate.
Nice Jamie, i am hoping this should show some promising results after time. probably need a broadband or RF amplifier to add in.
What do you mean? The voice? When humans vocal chords 'make sound' they're not emitting anything at all.. You're setting up standing waves in the oxygen and nitrogen which makes up the air.. Sound is not an emission it's a disturbance of the medium only. Why no sound in space because the medium is missing.. Why no weight in space because magnetism or gravity gets weaker as you leave large objects with acceleration to a null pressure gradient!
Yes, but when those parameters are in place you end up with measurable sounds waves! That's the essential part here on the ground. I passed on the space holiday package due to them not having any live music on the trip. 🤣
Hillarious..but I agree, who cares about the view...it's all about the sound on board
Calm down. You are getting all wound up over a point I never made. I largely agree with what you are saying... no need to get your knickers in a twist.
have you read about aether? Where Michelson-Morley and Einstein (general theory of relativity) both state that a 'medium' must exist for the propagation of various 'forms' see:
[1] https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/michelson-morley-1887-experiment
[2] https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/entrained-aether-theories-cannot
[3]https://aetherometry.com/Electronic_Publications/Science/einstein_aether_and_relativity.php
In reference [3], Einstein states "Recapitulating, we may say that according to the General Theory of Relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an Aether. According to the General Theory of Relativity space without Aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light,"
great idea involving a bit of fun for a change...this is sure to be!!
I'm impressed Karl, and thankful that someone is taking frequence modulation seriously. Of course finding the optimal frequency for the elimination of the foreign substances, is like finding a needle in a stack of needles.
In my opinion a good starting place would be to identify the frequency output of the target elements. Match those frequencies and adjust the intensity of the signal and pulse rate. My concern is that partial destruction of these elements may release the contents (pay load)
causing more damage than good.
Thank you
Yes, I agree that finding the frequency and matching it might be a good starting point, but that is for biological function interruption so I wonder if this won't work for these structures since they technically aren't biological, with biological function. I wonder if anyone can muscle test this.
Most of these materials which merge with your own are largely biological to be compatible with you. Maybe a portion that is not. But so far it seems most of the material and changes comes under that of advanced nano biology. But we only know so much.
Okay Karl can you stretch my brain a bit in regards to both lines of comments above and below: the understanding of us and everything which exists that we perceive...is the case of electrical energy resonating at
a specific rate/variable responsible for defining all these forms in the first place - as is widely understood to be the explanation? and if so....is this measure of electrical energy the same as or utterly different from speaking of ranges of frequencies? ie are these completely different expressions, electrical energies vs frequency ranges? i tend to think they are but don't they come close to being the same in some way?? feeling stupid today, but this is interesting to me 😒KK
Amplitude/energy amount and frequency need to be considered separately to manipulate matter effectively. So which frequency resonates with which molecules and how much is needed to destroy or benefit that molecule the way you want.
I have to look into a definition of frequency now, Which I'd call a signature...of energy, which perhaps doesn't speak of amplitiude, but of what?
I shall explore...thankyou😵💫
Thank you for your comment.
Actually Jessica, everything has a resonant frequency not just biological life forms. They also have tolerance levels. Thank about a crystal glass being shattered by an opera singer.
Yes, I'm aware, but thinking it's more along the lines of your second comment, about tolerance levels. Matching the frequency may or may not work for something like this. We just don't know, right? Because it isn't biological and may not respond in the same way. It's definitely a good starting point though, if you have a way of finding that frequency. Do you know anyone who is really good at muscle testing?
Oh it is biological, it is biomimetic material. This could even be a worse problem if the destructive frequencies are the same as that you have for lipids, biological material, etc.
Frequencies don't harm healthy tissue and organs, in fact, matching frequencies of biological material is supportive of it, like homeopathic sarcodes or a form of entrainment.
Absolutely and completely wrong. The government use the same formula for DEWS. It's even on the federal gov site somewhere, the Japanese formula for resonant destructive frequencies is how they ccukate frequencies to target and damage solid or biological matter but faster and with instant effects. I posted in David's private chat group a list of papers showing DNA damage from , RF, emf, and elf. So no, this statement couldn't be further from the truth. That's why RIFE himself quoted frequencies at that time he knew we're damaging. I'm not sure where you got that info from but whoever is touting that shouldn't be. Frequency CAN be extremely dangerous and damaging in endless ways. It also manipulates molecules or gases. Not meaning to knock you, just correcting this statement since someone could be harmed by this information if brave enough to make devices they do not understand.
Also a cell has more than one resonant frequency since they are made from various molecules, each having a different property. There is often not one resonant F. Pick the wrongs ones and output enough energy you will destroy the cell. See other comment.
I like the crystal glass theory though. Matching resonance may be harmonic, and is that good or bad to these things? lol
Well Jessica, I don't know.
At this point it's all hypothetical.
good points mate
Happy to see you giving frequencies a try. They will be the wave of the future more and more in the medical realm. Big pHARMas toxic drugs will go down in history as the biggest scam played in the people of the world. Don’t get me wrong, it has its place in medical emergencies.
It’s been quite a while, but I know I had suggested Spooky2 frequency generators. There is a group on Telegram called Spooky2 unofficial where there are several people that are pro’s at the frequencies. One in particular has fixed the frequency programs that weren’t functioning properly in the computer program. Like the Covid spike protein. The program is meant to destroy it. But it wasn’t working well. So he fixed it. Now it’s working well and helping people suffering with long Covid due to the spike proteins. I can get you his name if you are interested.
As far as i can tell the profiles added to spooky2 list were not based on anything at all. They have the DNA devices which cannot do what they claimed too. I borrowed the spooky with phanatron tube in the lab a while back. To my surprise it wasn't outputting what I expect proper RIFE to output on the oscilloscope at all. and it does this weird pulsing which a RIFE machine shouldn't do, i have no idea why they would use a pulse or the weird output i saw. If you want a real RIFE machine i would suggest looking at the MOPA valve amplifier and GB4000 generator. Many have said these are superior and closer to a real RIFE machine than a spooky. For me, the spooky is a novelty and i know that many people who tried to produce a proper RIFE machine which follows the original design have previously been shutdown, put out of business or went missing. I feel like they dont care about spooky2 and their large sales base for a reason. RIFE must function with the proper side-bands on a correctly modulated carrier signal. Ideally it was shown that a good RIFE machine needs to be around 600-900watts RF power and the spooky doesn't even come close. It wastes half its cycle pulsing. That means if a session was going to take 4 hours it would need to take 8 now to achieve what a constant phanatron signal would do. All in all, the spooky2 I personally rate as a novelty device. Their DNA repair think where you place samples on it or your finger in it is an absolute con. It doesn't even have the quality of op-amplifiers on the circuit which would be capable of doing such and it certainly doesn't have any advanced processing chips to process the signal. Its a pseudo science device, like the blue-shield EMF devices. expensive, and empty inside, but people fall for it. If i were to use RIFE in the future I would design my own.
I have owned both and feel the GB4000 with the MOPA is far superior quality, but you do pay significantly more for it.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and experiences with our Spooky2 devices. We appreciate all feedback, as it helps us continuously improve our products and offerings.
We understand that there are various products on the market, and the Rife technology landscape can be complex. We strive to provide a device that balances affordability, functionality, and accessibility.
Regarding your observations about the output and behaviour of the Spooky2 systems, we want to assure you that our engineering team is dedicated to ensuring the effectiveness and reliability of our products.
While we acknowledge differing opinions on our products, we are proud of the positive feedback and success stories shared by many users who have found value in Spooky2 in their wellness journeys. We encourage open discussions and would be glad to engage further about specific concerns or suggestions you have about improvements.
My concerns would be that the amplifier for the phanatron tube is far to weak to damage a large range of pathogens, that the tube is off for 50% time, and that some of the nano frequencies and and other profiles came out before researchers new anything about the nanomaterials in our body or their type. That seemed highly suspect. Also the waveform patterns were od. Nearly all science studies and trials back RIFE's early design parameters and show issues with the concept behind the spooky profile of function. The 40watts output part for me is a major attribute to how it's not possible to destroy a long list of pathogens with. I've had several friends sell their spooky because after a while they realised it wasnt curing their disease despite feeling different at first. I honestly don't know if that bit is placebo or a Pemf like charging benefit of cells. Maybe up the spooky central power output to a reasonable value between 100 to 500w, remove the pulsing, and correct the waveform output. Documentation does indeed show that is how an effective rife machine is made and that is what I would buy. If it tests could on the oscilloscope and meets that criteria I know it is a rife machine I want. And I do want one lol.
I appreciate your detailed feedback. Regarding your concerns about the amplifier strength, I'd like to point out that the output power and waveform settings can be adjusted by the user within our software. However, because plasma energy is quite powerful, and the settings require a certain level of understanding of RIFE theory, we have default configurations in our official software to ensure optimal performance for users at all experience levels.
We strive to balance accessibility with effective treatment, which is why we've chosen these standardized settings. Additionally, many users have reported positive results, which speaks to the effectiveness of our product when used correctly.
I understand that experiences can vary, and it's vital to have confidence in the tools you choose. We're continuously working to refine our products based on feedback from our community.
I am confused about the power rating part. Regardless of the settings you have put in for safety, it doesn't change the science. If much more than 40watts output is said to be required for a large range of pathogens and the spooky doesn't have that ability then how is the above situation you mentioned making any difference to requirements to kill pathogens which are known to be needed for many. If the Unit cant output more than 40watts, then that is a massive technical issue already. I think most will agree that the above statement begins to sound like a sales tactic since it disregards the obvious issue and babbles around it. The unit amplifier is capable of no more than 40watts maximum leaving it 60-500watts plus short of being able to destroy many pathogens in lab settings. There is no magic that will escape this fact. In fact i was rather shocked the CENTRAL amplifier was huge and weighed nothing at all. I figured that maybe it had a switch mode digital amplifier inside until i saw it only has 40watts (big box for nothing), but i know digital amps are actually not very good for RIFE frequency production because of switching on the transistors. I think what I am explaining is that spooky doesn't meet the technical requirements of any proven RIFE based lab experiments in history, and that cant be ignored if one understands these things. The criteria must be met or they do not work as intended. 40 watts is a joke when looking at proper RIFE devices. The only people I know who build proper RIFE devices and tried to sell them ended up dead or targeted like RIFE's associates such as Hoyland who tried to manufacture them in his own image and who designed the Hoyland wave concept. There are RF machines not sold as RIFE but essentially the same, but they are sold for different purposes and lab experiments. Spooky is the only company i know of that has done so well by not even following the science on RIFE and what was already known. There is very little left to learn about RIFE and how to optimize it, But many will claim a unique twist on a very simple technology. That is where you can fool the public, but you can fool an engineer who has studied into these sciences. The other thing is that I didn't realize my Substack was a SPOOKY feedback hub, lol. feels kind of weird lol its fine, and i am joking of course. It is nice to meet you and I am sure you are vested in the company that pays you, but i am pretty good at tearing down machines, and pseudo science in order to find things that actually work. For me, after also using a spooky and having a look around it, I rate it as overpriced trickery. The DNA correcting tools they sell as an option are complete pseudo science and they could never explain how it works or why they claimed it could knowing it hasn't even got any such hardware to do so inside of those devices. If i were you i wouldnt ask too many questions at work, they might not like it because they dont have answers. Therefore, it shows that at least some products spooky sell are trickery based on science concepts that do not exist or have not been proven anywhere. And they certainly cant be proven in a DNA device which has cheap, low grade, low bandwidth op-amps, no powerful processing circuitry, that is called conning people in my book. sorry, but no escaping reality there. Why an earth did spooky make cooky devices like that which they had to of known were not able to do what they were sold to. Just nuts. I was offered a whole load of REAL RIFE equipment which was custom designed by a widowed woman last year. I couldn't afford the shipping of his workshop and all the devices. Those were REAL RIFE machines and had massive RF amplifiers to drive all the equipment, because that is what is required !!!!!!!!! not an empty 40watt box by spooky
Nice, reminds me of Hulda Clark. That would be perfect to find the right frquence. Hula took a bacteria, then testet its frequency and then mad the same freq. to kill it.
It is a method even RIFE himself used. Today we have complex formulas if the material is known and then we can test that frequency to save time. I have some cheat methods inline too. see what happens.
You can literally FIND the right frequency for those of us with boots on the ground in the frequency field, so we can help people heal from this. I suspect it may be something we would need to use at least weekly or with exposure, at minimum. If we have the right frequency sets, we can program them into our devices (for me the GB4000 with MOPA). I am stoked and can't wait to see what you find. I hope your equipment can go high enough to find a solution.
there's an answer
Thank you for your dedication to help humanity!
Thank you for your support
You could use the Spooky2 XM generator or its precursor they give 20v if you use the boost that is in their shop.
Hi Karl check out the free rife software download here:
https://www.spooky2.com/downloadspage/
With this software you can manipulate wave forms and amplitudes. Go to the Setting tab to review options. Also, in the Programs tab search for key words like Covid and see what existing programs come up. The data base has 55K programs. They add new programs ongoing. You can set up and select and run a program on the virtual generator located on the Control tab in the lower left hand corner (VG). Once you have the program running you can observe the frequencies used and see the respective wave forms in the Settings tab. I've been using this for several years and it really works for detox and health issues. It's worth a look.
Yea actually, there is a few other pc aps too. Unfortunately the pc apps only go to the sound card spectrum. I had the spooky app before I even got to use a spooky. But yes I could try some of their frequencies. Will need a modulating circuit to have two function generators working as a wave on a carrier frequency. I did try the nano programs on the spooky2 setup before and didn't notice anything. I wonder what those frequencies were now, since I know likely ranges as charted above, plus others from papers. Should be interesting. Will look for a modulator and another wave generator of scientific grade.
this is a really interesting project....and aerobics for the mind...cool stuff !
I am using a Siglent SDG810 waveform generator to modulate a Hulda Clark 30KHz square wave onto a 3MHz sine wave carrier. The 3MHz carrier allows the square wave to penetrate deeper into the tissues. Two years ago, I confirmed using before-and-after testing that it eliminates parasites from my body: I asked a voll meter practitioner to test me for parasites; he detected two parasites (ascara and, if I remember correctly, fasciolopsis buski); I used the SDG810 by following Hulda Clark's zapper protocol (three 7-minute sessions with 20 minutes off between sessions). After the SDG810 treatment, my voll meter practitioner tested me again and said the parasites were gone. The SDG810 works!
Interesting, I've done a lot of research into biofields and frequency based science in medicine. The voll machine though, in multiple studies was shown to be hugely innacurrate with massive fundamental issues. Most papers Concluded that using these methods they could not correlate reliable results to a known pathogen. Another study showed the flaws in using the device and how it was applied. Another study showed that almost each time the results were different, another claimed it seemed to be able to show some kind of signal which may have been the parasite but it would reference the wrong kind and not be consistent either. My understanding is that the software and hardware at that time were not complex enough to be able to feedback this kind of information accurately. The software would have to have complex math functions to deduct, filter, and clean up these signals to be accurate. One of the design issues here is the very low signal levels and massive noise floors from everything else giving off it's unique signatures. Those with engineering experience will know this is no simple stuff. Not impossible, never, but had the voll meters used this level of complexity? Absolutely not, and without known databases before the device was created it would have been very confusing to work out how he machine would work. A single point reading from the body seriously limits any ability to locate the said issue reliably. Cell phone towers use triangulation to locate things and a similar methods wod have increased accuracy with others.
Medical researchers of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus used to lead in this field and this kind of healing became official treatment in the USSR. I don't know if it survived in westernized Russia. There is a meta-study report on microwavenews website, 20 or 25 years old if I recall, which sums up state of the science & art in that field. English translation, very useful for general study of emf, the main subject of that report.
On another note, the establishment pushes emf as underlying mechanism of life, but according to some experts in advanced physics, torsion field (TF) particles are responsible in our bodies and all living things for regulating health. They rush at speeds the multiple of lightspeed along "singalling paths" brain to organs to keep us healthy. The particles being of atomic and subatomic size, perhaps they would affect nanotech? Since TFs exist paralel with emf and have far greater reach, while you are using emf gadgets, I wonder how much of the observed effects are due to the TF. Perhaps screening emf of the gadgets (possible?) would reveal if your observed effects change or vanish.
Hulda Clark discovered, quite by accident, that a 30KHz square wave killed ALL viruses, bacteria, parasites, mold and fungus. Once she discovered this, she stopped using sine waves. A sine wave has to be tuned to the resonant frequency of the microorganism being targeted, whereas a 30KHz square wave kills all microorganisms regardless of their resonant frequencies. She speculated that it was the enormous quantity of harmonics generated by the square wave that enabled it to target such a broad range of resonant frequencies. Her book The Cure For All Diseases discusses this, and provides the schematic diagram of the 9 volt square wave generator (zapper) built for her by her son Geoff Clark using a 555 timer chip. It has to be a pulsed DC square wave, i.e., 0V to +9V, not -4.5V to +4.5V. The latter is not effective at killing microorganisms, she found.
"killed ALL viruses, bacteria, parasites, mold and fungus"
Per terrain theory, these are inncocents trying to restore balance in our body disrupted by toxic, radiation etc. stress.
Virus is a patented fraud, I wonder what Hulda observed and how she identified "viruses".
My function generator does offer a ttl output. TTL signals are 0 to 5v logic signals. These signals are also easier to amplify with simpler amplifier designs. No need for a bipolar design which means you can almlst use a single logic mosfet with larger power supply. Will give it a go. But might be a problem testing microscopically since charged material will end up at one contact from single direction flow.
As an avid frequency healer, I am very excited to see this unfold.
Jessica, have you heard of the hypothesis that it's the information about a pathogen structure received by a living organism via torsion field particles which causes a reaction as if the organism was exposed to the real pathogen? Apparently, Montagnier, a French Nobilist, has proven it experimantally, got a Nobel price for it, and another (Russian?) scientist replicated the result with different means of remotely sending the torsion particle info.
can you find a paper for it? the only information i found about certain claims with torsion fields honestly didn't make any sense. Someone sent me an old paper too which almost looked genuine, but the paper failed to show any evidence of the claim by the end. It was almost like smoke and mirrors. so if there is a paper and a nobble-prize for it id love to see more.
Karl, kindly see my reply to Jessica below.
Yes, in fact, it ws just explained the movie that aired yesterday on the CHD website called, "Introducing Homeopathy." They explained his experiments in depth. I don't know when it will be offered again for viewing.
I had found that info years ago when I was researching why kids with PANDAS can respond instantly to a strep "carrier" and they didn't need an incubation period to react. It really aligns with the concepts around homeopathy. I am a homeopath and a frequency healer, so I see imprints of old "trauma" and bugs responding to frequencies all the time.
Pls link the movie, Jessica. The following is also for Karl's comment above. I 've translated to English a paper from former Soviet medical-physical institute which performs research & clinical trials in torsion field applications. I lost this and other professional material when my blog was destroyed Oct 2023.
From memory, they found on several hepatitis patients that instead of a year or so of treatment with expensive Western medication, the patients recovered at significantly higher rate within up to a few weeks. The method involves the drug and a TF beam goes thru it aimed at the patient's liver if I recall.
The paper shows simple equipment put together for the purpose. Karl could do it, no problem :)
Montagnier's experiment:
"Radionic methods make possible more ambitious projects of transmitting whole genes by radiofrequency links, and transferring them to living organisms for gene therapy, or, on the contrary, for selective covert murder, depending on the implementer. Let’s not expect the military to busy themselves with gene therapy. Torsion field particles make possible copying, in the form of torsion field, DNA’s original chemical form. Transfer of the particles to human body causes cheating of natural mechanisms and re-construction of the transferred DNA in cells.
The first succesful reproduction of DNA from a torsion field signal sent over the Internet accomplished Nobel Prize winner, Luc Montagnier..."
http://www.torsionfield.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Permanent_contamination_of_the_Earth_by_5G_DW.pdf
If need be, autotranslate fragements I skipped. Wiki describes his work but fears to call it TF physics.
https://introducinghomeopathy.com/
Where can I find the storage cabinet with plastic drawers in the photo behind your microscope? Am looking for a cabinet exactly like that to store small parts.
Several places sell those. They are cheap on aces like amazon quite often. Parts bin, parts drawers is often a common term. I used to have loads of them full of components going around every wall. So yes, very helpful!
Or recycle small or big, plastic or glass jars with lids, placed in boxes or chest of drawers you like and have available. My wife neatly reduced clutter with sawing supplies this wat, to my relief :) Then I stole the idea and have like storage and collections for most everything smallish.
Thank you for sharing
I would use gold electrodes or platinum. Even silver wil oxidize quickly. You don't need to solder anything just use aligator clips.