"Sodium citrate has been proposed to dissolve ionically cross-linked hydrogels by exchanging calcium ions with monovalent cations and sodium ions. Furthermore, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a chelating agent that binds mostly bivalent ions (calcium), has been introduced to dissolve hydrogels"
I think as with Morgellons/CDB we are going to find some remedies work better for some and others for others. Having had Morg for a long time, I think that's due to the chemistry of each individual's body and things like diet and environment and blood type and genetics.
Also, what doesn't work at one point may work at another. That's part of the complexity. That the tech is using the host's body as building blocks and the tech is flexible and opportunistic. For instance, I used colloidal silver years ago and it had little positive effect. Now that it's being made as nano silver, it's having very positive effect. I just needed the smaller particles. Other people had used colloidal silver and it worked fine for them. I tried 20 Mule Team Borax like you buy in the laundry detergent section and my body would not tolerate it. Years later, I tried a purer version of Borax and got good results with no ill effects. So there you go.
So...we keep trying. I have Sodium Citrate on the way and have stopped all other detox substances so I can see what the Sodium Citrate will do. Pretty excited!
Good question. You do not expend all these resources to no perceived or expected benefit. I’m sure it has been studied either in animals or possibly small human populations. The technology is being scaled up. Self assembly may not be perfected yet. Too many variables in large populations. Assessments are done in macro until self assembly results in measurable or workable devices. Whatever that may be. Too bad about the collateral damage the just happens to cull the heard along the path of devices to corral the herd. Those remaining will have a tolerance to the technology and more robust solutions can then be developed.
Being that it is so ubiquitous they probably already have countermeasures while development is ongoing. It’s up to us to find those.
Clifford Carnicom has been studying this current tech in the injections, water, air, etc. and Morgellons/CDB for many years. His findings are exactly as you say. - Morgs was the beta test. Primarily sprayed on people, but it didn't have the desired effect, so they had to inject it under the pretext of the plandemic scam. There are also other tweaks. Carnicom has a new substack but his website goes back two decades.
I read an article about a new blood cleansing machine based on kidney dialysis but light years ahead. I wish I had saved the article. It disappeared and I read so much stuff, I lost it. I'm sure there is some antidote like this. Probably more than one.
I also agree they don't care about the ones who die rapidly. Those are collateral damage in their eyes. Like Frankenstein's failures prior to creating the final monster.
I truly pity those who tolerate and incorporate this crap. They will be zombies of a sort. Slaves.
I just looked it up now that you gave me the name and yes, that's it. I wondered at the time if the EBOO or something like it could be used to clean the tech, etc. out of the blood and if that's how wealthy people are keeping themselves healthy?
I don't know if it filters that small, but as in Karl's photos, the tech isn't incredibly smaller than RBCs?
I tried to find if EBOO can filter nanoparticles, but haven't figured that out yet.
In reading many of Ana Maria Mihalcea substacks where the introduction of a WiFi signal induces these nano structures to assemble, and even more frightening , apparently according to a couple of attorney's, Todd Callender, and Thomas Renz, a certain timed pulsed burst of wifi in a specific wavelength will cause the lipid envelope to open and release other pathogens . You might want to collaberate with both of them and Ana Mihalcea if you have not already done so.
Karl - your tagline - Man Against the MICROBES - tends to suggests that natural biological entities are what you are investigating and opposing. I have an alternate tagline recommendation that seems far more accurate and appropriate :
Margie - I too have to play catch up. This info is so rich and dense, both the graphics and narrative that goes along with images, it is way way way too much to try to take in a single sitting. Karl C has moved the needle big time with respect to all of this. It's going to take quite some time to digest, intellectually, spiritually, etc. This is truly mind-blowing micro-investigation on Karl's part.
Will - Amen. ■ As an artist I am nonverbal to much imagery; then being a Believer, I have a life full of occupation. I enjoy how this group are true seekers testing what works and finding what does not work. It is a movement that I respect and enjoy; actually all are very creative. M
With apologies if this seems unrelated and bearing in mind I'm not a science person. But, I bought a small UV light some time back. Here, we have a downstairs tiny bathroom without a window, so when you go in and don't flick the light switch, it's pitch black. Something made me, one day, go in, close the door and turn on the UV light and stand in front of the mirror. I'd been outdoors gardening and yes, there had been chemtrails overhead.
The light showed my hairline and scalp, face and throat all covered in tiny, multi coloured particles. All the colours of the rainbow! And then some...
And they were, on very close inspection (using a magnifying glass to the mirror image included) perfectly square.
Too old to care how crazy I sound, folks. But I remain convinced they've been crop-dusting us people for decades now, except they seem to have upped their game the past year judging by the global increase in sun blocking chemtrails that seem to serve three purposes..weather manipulation, sun blocking and smart dusting everything beneath the jets.
My symptoms started approx a year ago....although being unvaccinated who really knows when this all started? They are massively doing chemtrails in my semi rural area. The red wine/grape juice test a year ago showed what I like to call - dancing fungi - and they were big blobs. That has subsided after a year of intense detox efforts but I still have baby type jumping beans in my saliva. I've also noticed crystal type debris being emitted from my skin and on my hair (when I look at it under a scope). My brain fog dissipated after doing a saturated potassium iodine protocol however I still see what looks like small red dots (spores?) underneath my skin. They are getting better but there is no doubt in my mind that this is a bio-techno weapon. I'm looking forward to trying the sodium citrate.
Dr Ana has russian article says they found what she did. But it was from a swab test! They coupled reverse transcription with xna and pcr. i cant retype my comments.
My question is not naive. How can we deduce the intent of these nanotechnologies from science? To my knowledge while we can seemingly deduce batch number and mfg of vaccine we know of no tracking of outcome . That is other than death and or severe illness, excess deaths by age group and type of death. So what conclusion can we draw from nanotech? It is not Euthanasia. Yet it does not seem to be studied.
Well . Yes. I do not favor being a sinner of an angry God though. I favor Berdyaev.
The technical and economic processes of modern civilisation turn the person into their own tool, they demand from it an incessant activity, making use of each moment of life for activity. Modern civilisation negates contemplation and threatens to completely shove it out from life, to make it impossible. This will mean, that man ceases to pray, that he will no longer have any sort of relationship to God, that he will no longer see beauty and unselfishly know truth. The person is defined not only in relation to time, but also in relation to eternity. The actualism of modern civilisation is a denial of eternity, is an enslavement of man to time. No one instant of life thus is of value in itself, nor has relationship to eternity or God, every moment is but a means for the one following, needing all the more quickly but to pass away and be replaced by another. The exclusive actualism of suchlike a sort changes the relationship to time -- there occurs an acceleration of time, a mad chase. The person cannot hold on amidst the flooding current of time, in this actualisation of each moment, it is unable to think about matters, it is unable to conceive of the meaning of its own life, since meaning is always revealed in relation to eternity, and the flood of time is of itself incomprehensible. Indisputably, man is called to activity, to work, to creativity, he cannot only meditate. The world is not merely a stage-show for man, a spectacle. Man has to transform and organise the world, to continue on with the world-creation. But man remains a person, the image and likeness of God, and will not be transformed into a mere means of an impersonal animate and societal process, only in this instance -- if he is the point of intersection of two worlds, the eternal and the temporal, if he acts not only within time, but also contemplates eternity, if he inwardly defines himself in relation to God. This is a fundamental question of the contemporary actualist civilisation, the question about the fate of the person, the destiny of man. Man cannot be only an object, he is a subject, he possesses his own existence within himself. Man, transformed into the tool of an impersonal actualised process within time, is already no longer a man. The social collective might think it so, but not the person. In the person there is always something independent of the flood of time and of the social process. The smothering of contemplation is the smothering of an enormous part of culture, with which is connected its summit and blossoming -- mysticism, metaphysics, aesthetics. A purely at work actualist civilisation transforms science and art into a mere accommodation of the productive technical process. We see this in the intent of Communistic Soviet culture. This is a deep crisis of culture. The future of man, the future of culture depends on this, whether man should still want for a moment to be free, to consider and think about his life, to turn his gaze towards the heavens. True, the idea of labour and a labouring society is a great and fully Christian idea. The aristocratic contemplation by a privileged cultural class, freed of participating in the labour process, frequently became a false contemplation, and in such a form it has scarcely any place in the future. But every working man also, every man has a moment of contemplation, immersed within himself, of prayer and praise of God, of the beholding of beauty, of an unselfish appreciation of the world. Contemplation and action can and ought to be combined in the integral wholeness of the person, and only their conjoining affirms and strengthens the person. A person, totally dissipating oneself in activity, in the temporal process, becomes exhausted, and the flow of spiritual energy within ceases. Amidst all this, the activity usually is understood not in the Gospel manner, not as service to neighbour, but as service to idols. The liturgical cycle of religious life is unique a combination of contemplation and action, in which the person can find for himself a wellspring of strength and energy. We are at present at a fatal process of the degeneration of the person, itself always an image of utmost being, -- but reformed anew into the temporal collectives, with demands of an endlessly growing activeness. Man is a creative being, an image of the Creator. But the activeness, which modern civilisation demands from man, essentially, is a denial of his creative nature, and therefore it is a denial of man himself. The creativity of man presupposes the combining of contemplation and action. The very distinction between contemplation and action is relative. Spirit is essentially active, and in contemplation there is a dynamic element. We come nigh the final problem, connected with the spiritual condition of the contemporary world, to the problem of man, as a religious problem. Since the crisis of man occurs within the world, it is not only a crisis within man, but is also the crisis of man himself. The utmost existence of man is rendered problematic.
I agree with you 100%. You verbalized the issue of object vs subject, activity vs contemplation, time vs eternity, disconnection vs connection beautifully, thank you. I am totally convinced that it is our freedom to choose to connect to God which is attacked from all angles. Choosing to be religious in the ethymological sense of the word - religare -, being bonded to the source of eternal life+oneself+others, is upwardly challenging
Thank you. I just was wondering why this pdf was last revised in 1999 if Berdyaev passed away in 1948. What was there to revise? I became aware that there is a "revision" being done on all writings online, an intermediary step before book disappearance or "burning"
Hi Karl - from experience, working with urinalysis is a B I G can of worms, as it takes experience none of us have. Urology is a whole specialized field! Not to say we shouldn't dive into it, but our best efforts to produce and interpret data will fall short of those who have made careers out of this field. I hope there is a specialist out there who might give us a hand?
Nobody has said this, but it truly needs to be said. Let it be said that our small handful of folks working on this evil nano-tech problem are the greatest I've ever worked with - every single one of you! Working without a budget, using less than top of the line equipment, beg borrow and stealing everything we need, trying to cover topics we've never encountered before, and having uncovered what we have so far - ladies and gentlemen, you all deserve a Nobel Prize. I'm just glad we all live and work far apart. If we were together, there would be a huge crater where our lab used to be.
Regarding your latest article on urinalysis: I have not the slightest doubt you are showing nano-tech in the photos, but you are also showing a ton of natural things in urine that we can't discern. A HUGE component of urine contains epithelial cells which is the lining of our whole urinary system. But, not once was this mentioned. The inexperienced reader sees the rafts of material in photos and thinks - holy cow, this is riddled with nano-tech. Fair warning dear reader: it is NOT all nano-tech, but an UNDETERMINED portion thereof is completely natural. Further, urine contains many different species of crystals. Depending on what the person ate, how well hydrated they were, there could be half a dozen or more different types of crystals in urine, not to mention the sheer quantity of them. People living in the arid southwest, or those working hard during summer, or while suffering from a mild UTI, will have TONS of crystals, as they are unaware of becoming dehydrated. This puts a lot of stress on the kidneys which throw out salt fast as they can. I know, as I got a kidney stone from all this, and getting it removed was no picnic. Back to urinalysis: the only way to ascertain the good, the bad and the ugly in urine is to do statistical analyses of what is seen in the microscope. How is this done? Its very laborious and takes inserting a grid into the microscope ocular / eyepiece. Then, every particle at every line intersection must be identified as best as possible and tallied. Or, the contents of each grid field must be estimated to reveal relative percentages of each contents. So far, nobody has done this. Many of the particles in this article's photos cannot be identified as the photo covers too much area / too low of a magnification. I highly suspect much of the raft-like masses consists of epithelial cells. And... once you start to view centrifuged urine, all this confusion gets much worse as epithelial cells readily spin down but will be packed together with everything else, both natural and nano-tech. Teasing this apart from a paste is simply impossible. It must be analyzed in a thinner suspension like a fresh urine sample. Literature details how this should be done to get reasonable repeatability.
Yes. Same here occasionally. It may be some tech issue with how SubStack display's the posts, or it could be on our end with our browser or operating system....I dunno...but it happens randomly, from my end.
Karl, have you read OUTRAGED HUMAN'S recent article? He's talking all about the tech and how it attaches in a "corona" to cells. There is no virus he's saying conclusively. Only tech attaching to cells.
I'm going to have to read it again. It's pretty dense with info but is hand-in-hand with what you're finding. I think.
Received from Amazon a 1.5 lb bag of Anthony's Food Grade Premium Sodium Citrate at a cost of $15.27, including tax. The package list the only ingredient as Trisodium Citrate Dihydrate. Took my first two doses today, each of 3.5 grams in 2 cups of distilled water, and my mind seems clearer already.
Other than monitoring one's feelings, is there any way other than microscopic examination of urine or blood to see if this is truly working as expected? Monitoring one's feelings is so, so subjective.
I am unvaccinated, but recently did have a small cyst removed from my scalp, receiving a local anesthetic in the process. Since seeing reports of adulterated dental anesthetics, I am suspicious that most local anesthetics might be similarly tainted.
Didn't have the blood or urine tested with a dark field scope, except I did get CBD with auto differential and Comprehensive metabolic panel done through a local conventional MD who didn't know or want to hear about self assembling nanotech. At the time I got the tests on the Dec. 11th, I already tried a week of EDTA and was concerned about mineral depletion, which motivated the tests. I had also been taking Methylene Blue mixed with 1/2 tsp of ascorbic acid twice a day for several months before. My blood tests did show a red blood cell count at the low end of normal, so I doubled up on iron and copper supplements; otherwise all was normal.
In addition to daily high intake of standard vitamins and minerals, I do additionally take NAC, Quercetin, Green Tea, zinc, vitamin K2, and the McCullough formula of Nattokinase, Bromelain, and Curcumin.
I also have for the last 21 years been taking extremely high doses of Lugol's iodine (50mg daily) plus 400mcg of Selenium. I found that the iodine helped control Parkinsons like shaking in my hands, which virtually disappeared for 18 years, until I became ill in 2020, presumably with Covid-19. The shaking then started again, until I experimented with nicotine lozenges, which reduced, but did not completely eliminate the shaking. Still taking the iodine and selenium also.
Here is an interesting article on post Covid-19 vaccine detox using iodine:
Not sure if you've ran across this
"Sodium citrate has been proposed to dissolve ionically cross-linked hydrogels by exchanging calcium ions with monovalent cations and sodium ions. Furthermore, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a chelating agent that binds mostly bivalent ions (calcium), has been introduced to dissolve hydrogels"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643559/#:~:text=Sodium%20citrate%20has%20been%20proposed,been%20introduced%20to%20dissolve%20hydrogels.
I think as with Morgellons/CDB we are going to find some remedies work better for some and others for others. Having had Morg for a long time, I think that's due to the chemistry of each individual's body and things like diet and environment and blood type and genetics.
Also, what doesn't work at one point may work at another. That's part of the complexity. That the tech is using the host's body as building blocks and the tech is flexible and opportunistic. For instance, I used colloidal silver years ago and it had little positive effect. Now that it's being made as nano silver, it's having very positive effect. I just needed the smaller particles. Other people had used colloidal silver and it worked fine for them. I tried 20 Mule Team Borax like you buy in the laundry detergent section and my body would not tolerate it. Years later, I tried a purer version of Borax and got good results with no ill effects. So there you go.
So...we keep trying. I have Sodium Citrate on the way and have stopped all other detox substances so I can see what the Sodium Citrate will do. Pretty excited!
Thanks curious, I put that out in my notes.
Wow, Great relevant info !! Adding sodium nitrate test results to my notes as well Matt.
Good question. You do not expend all these resources to no perceived or expected benefit. I’m sure it has been studied either in animals or possibly small human populations. The technology is being scaled up. Self assembly may not be perfected yet. Too many variables in large populations. Assessments are done in macro until self assembly results in measurable or workable devices. Whatever that may be. Too bad about the collateral damage the just happens to cull the heard along the path of devices to corral the herd. Those remaining will have a tolerance to the technology and more robust solutions can then be developed.
Being that it is so ubiquitous they probably already have countermeasures while development is ongoing. It’s up to us to find those.
Clifford Carnicom has been studying this current tech in the injections, water, air, etc. and Morgellons/CDB for many years. His findings are exactly as you say. - Morgs was the beta test. Primarily sprayed on people, but it didn't have the desired effect, so they had to inject it under the pretext of the plandemic scam. There are also other tweaks. Carnicom has a new substack but his website goes back two decades.
carnicominstitute.org
I read an article about a new blood cleansing machine based on kidney dialysis but light years ahead. I wish I had saved the article. It disappeared and I read so much stuff, I lost it. I'm sure there is some antidote like this. Probably more than one.
I also agree they don't care about the ones who die rapidly. Those are collateral damage in their eyes. Like Frankenstein's failures prior to creating the final monster.
I truly pity those who tolerate and incorporate this crap. They will be zombies of a sort. Slaves.
God rest their souls.
I just looked it up now that you gave me the name and yes, that's it. I wondered at the time if the EBOO or something like it could be used to clean the tech, etc. out of the blood and if that's how wealthy people are keeping themselves healthy?
I don't know if it filters that small, but as in Karl's photos, the tech isn't incredibly smaller than RBCs?
I tried to find if EBOO can filter nanoparticles, but haven't figured that out yet.
Thanks so much for cluing me in.
In reading many of Ana Maria Mihalcea substacks where the introduction of a WiFi signal induces these nano structures to assemble, and even more frightening , apparently according to a couple of attorney's, Todd Callender, and Thomas Renz, a certain timed pulsed burst of wifi in a specific wavelength will cause the lipid envelope to open and release other pathogens . You might want to collaberate with both of them and Ana Mihalcea if you have not already done so.
Karl - your tagline - Man Against the MICROBES - tends to suggests that natural biological entities are what you are investigating and opposing. I have an alternate tagline recommendation that seems far more accurate and appropriate :
Man Against the MICRO-BORGS
Karl - Great pictures! Will study! ■ Thank you. M
Margie - I too have to play catch up. This info is so rich and dense, both the graphics and narrative that goes along with images, it is way way way too much to try to take in a single sitting. Karl C has moved the needle big time with respect to all of this. It's going to take quite some time to digest, intellectually, spiritually, etc. This is truly mind-blowing micro-investigation on Karl's part.
Will - Amen. ■ As an artist I am nonverbal to much imagery; then being a Believer, I have a life full of occupation. I enjoy how this group are true seekers testing what works and finding what does not work. It is a movement that I respect and enjoy; actually all are very creative. M
With apologies if this seems unrelated and bearing in mind I'm not a science person. But, I bought a small UV light some time back. Here, we have a downstairs tiny bathroom without a window, so when you go in and don't flick the light switch, it's pitch black. Something made me, one day, go in, close the door and turn on the UV light and stand in front of the mirror. I'd been outdoors gardening and yes, there had been chemtrails overhead.
The light showed my hairline and scalp, face and throat all covered in tiny, multi coloured particles. All the colours of the rainbow! And then some...
And they were, on very close inspection (using a magnifying glass to the mirror image included) perfectly square.
Too old to care how crazy I sound, folks. But I remain convinced they've been crop-dusting us people for decades now, except they seem to have upped their game the past year judging by the global increase in sun blocking chemtrails that seem to serve three purposes..weather manipulation, sun blocking and smart dusting everything beneath the jets.
Of course, look up www.geoengineeringwatch.org
My symptoms started approx a year ago....although being unvaccinated who really knows when this all started? They are massively doing chemtrails in my semi rural area. The red wine/grape juice test a year ago showed what I like to call - dancing fungi - and they were big blobs. That has subsided after a year of intense detox efforts but I still have baby type jumping beans in my saliva. I've also noticed crystal type debris being emitted from my skin and on my hair (when I look at it under a scope). My brain fog dissipated after doing a saturated potassium iodine protocol however I still see what looks like small red dots (spores?) underneath my skin. They are getting better but there is no doubt in my mind that this is a bio-techno weapon. I'm looking forward to trying the sodium citrate.
Dr Ana has russian article says they found what she did. But it was from a swab test! They coupled reverse transcription with xna and pcr. i cant retype my comments.
My question is not naive. How can we deduce the intent of these nanotechnologies from science? To my knowledge while we can seemingly deduce batch number and mfg of vaccine we know of no tracking of outcome . That is other than death and or severe illness, excess deaths by age group and type of death. So what conclusion can we draw from nanotech? It is not Euthanasia. Yet it does not seem to be studied.
Stegiel, this is where a spiritual motive must be taken into consideration.
Well . Yes. I do not favor being a sinner of an angry God though. I favor Berdyaev.
The technical and economic processes of modern civilisation turn the person into their own tool, they demand from it an incessant activity, making use of each moment of life for activity. Modern civilisation negates contemplation and threatens to completely shove it out from life, to make it impossible. This will mean, that man ceases to pray, that he will no longer have any sort of relationship to God, that he will no longer see beauty and unselfishly know truth. The person is defined not only in relation to time, but also in relation to eternity. The actualism of modern civilisation is a denial of eternity, is an enslavement of man to time. No one instant of life thus is of value in itself, nor has relationship to eternity or God, every moment is but a means for the one following, needing all the more quickly but to pass away and be replaced by another. The exclusive actualism of suchlike a sort changes the relationship to time -- there occurs an acceleration of time, a mad chase. The person cannot hold on amidst the flooding current of time, in this actualisation of each moment, it is unable to think about matters, it is unable to conceive of the meaning of its own life, since meaning is always revealed in relation to eternity, and the flood of time is of itself incomprehensible. Indisputably, man is called to activity, to work, to creativity, he cannot only meditate. The world is not merely a stage-show for man, a spectacle. Man has to transform and organise the world, to continue on with the world-creation. But man remains a person, the image and likeness of God, and will not be transformed into a mere means of an impersonal animate and societal process, only in this instance -- if he is the point of intersection of two worlds, the eternal and the temporal, if he acts not only within time, but also contemplates eternity, if he inwardly defines himself in relation to God. This is a fundamental question of the contemporary actualist civilisation, the question about the fate of the person, the destiny of man. Man cannot be only an object, he is a subject, he possesses his own existence within himself. Man, transformed into the tool of an impersonal actualised process within time, is already no longer a man. The social collective might think it so, but not the person. In the person there is always something independent of the flood of time and of the social process. The smothering of contemplation is the smothering of an enormous part of culture, with which is connected its summit and blossoming -- mysticism, metaphysics, aesthetics. A purely at work actualist civilisation transforms science and art into a mere accommodation of the productive technical process. We see this in the intent of Communistic Soviet culture. This is a deep crisis of culture. The future of man, the future of culture depends on this, whether man should still want for a moment to be free, to consider and think about his life, to turn his gaze towards the heavens. True, the idea of labour and a labouring society is a great and fully Christian idea. The aristocratic contemplation by a privileged cultural class, freed of participating in the labour process, frequently became a false contemplation, and in such a form it has scarcely any place in the future. But every working man also, every man has a moment of contemplation, immersed within himself, of prayer and praise of God, of the beholding of beauty, of an unselfish appreciation of the world. Contemplation and action can and ought to be combined in the integral wholeness of the person, and only their conjoining affirms and strengthens the person. A person, totally dissipating oneself in activity, in the temporal process, becomes exhausted, and the flow of spiritual energy within ceases. Amidst all this, the activity usually is understood not in the Gospel manner, not as service to neighbour, but as service to idols. The liturgical cycle of religious life is unique a combination of contemplation and action, in which the person can find for himself a wellspring of strength and energy. We are at present at a fatal process of the degeneration of the person, itself always an image of utmost being, -- but reformed anew into the temporal collectives, with demands of an endlessly growing activeness. Man is a creative being, an image of the Creator. But the activeness, which modern civilisation demands from man, essentially, is a denial of his creative nature, and therefore it is a denial of man himself. The creativity of man presupposes the combining of contemplation and action. The very distinction between contemplation and action is relative. Spirit is essentially active, and in contemplation there is a dynamic element. We come nigh the final problem, connected with the spiritual condition of the contemporary world, to the problem of man, as a religious problem. Since the crisis of man occurs within the world, it is not only a crisis within man, but is also the crisis of man himself. The utmost existence of man is rendered problematic.
I agree with you 100%. You verbalized the issue of object vs subject, activity vs contemplation, time vs eternity, disconnection vs connection beautifully, thank you. I am totally convinced that it is our freedom to choose to connect to God which is attacked from all angles. Choosing to be religious in the ethymological sense of the word - religare -, being bonded to the source of eternal life+oneself+others, is upwardly challenging
Very. Berdyaev wrote on this quite well. https://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Philosophy/Sui-Generis/Berdyaev/essays/worth.htm
Thank you. I just was wondering why this pdf was last revised in 1999 if Berdyaev passed away in 1948. What was there to revise? I became aware that there is a "revision" being done on all writings online, an intermediary step before book disappearance or "burning"
Reissued publication. Many of his books are reissued and or old texts uploaded.
Hi Stegiel, I’ve noticed this ‘doings’ craze too, both in myself and in transacting with others.
I’m seeing that the busy does indeed prevent any self growth. It has been more difficult to meditate these past few years.
Thank you for articulating this.
Hi Karl - from experience, working with urinalysis is a B I G can of worms, as it takes experience none of us have. Urology is a whole specialized field! Not to say we shouldn't dive into it, but our best efforts to produce and interpret data will fall short of those who have made careers out of this field. I hope there is a specialist out there who might give us a hand?
Nobody has said this, but it truly needs to be said. Let it be said that our small handful of folks working on this evil nano-tech problem are the greatest I've ever worked with - every single one of you! Working without a budget, using less than top of the line equipment, beg borrow and stealing everything we need, trying to cover topics we've never encountered before, and having uncovered what we have so far - ladies and gentlemen, you all deserve a Nobel Prize. I'm just glad we all live and work far apart. If we were together, there would be a huge crater where our lab used to be.
Regarding your latest article on urinalysis: I have not the slightest doubt you are showing nano-tech in the photos, but you are also showing a ton of natural things in urine that we can't discern. A HUGE component of urine contains epithelial cells which is the lining of our whole urinary system. But, not once was this mentioned. The inexperienced reader sees the rafts of material in photos and thinks - holy cow, this is riddled with nano-tech. Fair warning dear reader: it is NOT all nano-tech, but an UNDETERMINED portion thereof is completely natural. Further, urine contains many different species of crystals. Depending on what the person ate, how well hydrated they were, there could be half a dozen or more different types of crystals in urine, not to mention the sheer quantity of them. People living in the arid southwest, or those working hard during summer, or while suffering from a mild UTI, will have TONS of crystals, as they are unaware of becoming dehydrated. This puts a lot of stress on the kidneys which throw out salt fast as they can. I know, as I got a kidney stone from all this, and getting it removed was no picnic. Back to urinalysis: the only way to ascertain the good, the bad and the ugly in urine is to do statistical analyses of what is seen in the microscope. How is this done? Its very laborious and takes inserting a grid into the microscope ocular / eyepiece. Then, every particle at every line intersection must be identified as best as possible and tallied. Or, the contents of each grid field must be estimated to reveal relative percentages of each contents. So far, nobody has done this. Many of the particles in this article's photos cannot be identified as the photo covers too much area / too low of a magnification. I highly suspect much of the raft-like masses consists of epithelial cells. And... once you start to view centrifuged urine, all this confusion gets much worse as epithelial cells readily spin down but will be packed together with everything else, both natural and nano-tech. Teasing this apart from a paste is simply impossible. It must be analyzed in a thinner suspension like a fresh urine sample. Literature details how this should be done to get reasonable repeatability.
Cannot see the pictures. Anybody else having this problem?
Yes. Same here occasionally. It may be some tech issue with how SubStack display's the posts, or it could be on our end with our browser or operating system....I dunno...but it happens randomly, from my end.
Karl, have you read OUTRAGED HUMAN'S recent article? He's talking all about the tech and how it attaches in a "corona" to cells. There is no virus he's saying conclusively. Only tech attaching to cells.
I'm going to have to read it again. It's pretty dense with info but is hand-in-hand with what you're finding. I think.
Thanks, again.
Received from Amazon a 1.5 lb bag of Anthony's Food Grade Premium Sodium Citrate at a cost of $15.27, including tax. The package list the only ingredient as Trisodium Citrate Dihydrate. Took my first two doses today, each of 3.5 grams in 2 cups of distilled water, and my mind seems clearer already.
Other than monitoring one's feelings, is there any way other than microscopic examination of urine or blood to see if this is truly working as expected? Monitoring one's feelings is so, so subjective.
I am unvaccinated, but recently did have a small cyst removed from my scalp, receiving a local anesthetic in the process. Since seeing reports of adulterated dental anesthetics, I am suspicious that most local anesthetics might be similarly tainted.
Did you do urine and live blood analysis before starting on the SC? I hope each person who tries it will do so if they have the means.
Are you taking any other products like Vitamin C, NAC or Glutathione?
Didn't have the blood or urine tested with a dark field scope, except I did get CBD with auto differential and Comprehensive metabolic panel done through a local conventional MD who didn't know or want to hear about self assembling nanotech. At the time I got the tests on the Dec. 11th, I already tried a week of EDTA and was concerned about mineral depletion, which motivated the tests. I had also been taking Methylene Blue mixed with 1/2 tsp of ascorbic acid twice a day for several months before. My blood tests did show a red blood cell count at the low end of normal, so I doubled up on iron and copper supplements; otherwise all was normal.
In addition to daily high intake of standard vitamins and minerals, I do additionally take NAC, Quercetin, Green Tea, zinc, vitamin K2, and the McCullough formula of Nattokinase, Bromelain, and Curcumin.
I also have for the last 21 years been taking extremely high doses of Lugol's iodine (50mg daily) plus 400mcg of Selenium. I found that the iodine helped control Parkinsons like shaking in my hands, which virtually disappeared for 18 years, until I became ill in 2020, presumably with Covid-19. The shaking then started again, until I experimented with nicotine lozenges, which reduced, but did not completely eliminate the shaking. Still taking the iodine and selenium also.
Here is an interesting article on post Covid-19 vaccine detox using iodine:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552616/
Where did you get the distilled water?
At WalMart in 1 gallon jugs, their brand.
Thank you.
That was in response to Stegiel.
Hej Karl,
I found these rectangles that you have in your urine in your blood - including their "production process".
Since I haven't been here on this platform for long - I'm writing to you here now and the link to the corresponding video
https://substack.com/inbox/post/139840220
normally I would say - have fun - but it goes by quite quickly
Wow! 😳
Thank you, Karl! Great narrative in visual and written form. I'm learning a lot.