I only found Ana's Substack a few months ago and have not read enough of her work probably to notice contradictions. I saw recently that she, like a few telling the truth about the global technocratic attack on humanity had an attempt on her life which could easily have killed her but she survived due to her training etc she said. Workin…
I only found Ana's Substack a few months ago and have not read enough of her work probably to notice contradictions. I saw recently that she, like a few telling the truth about the global technocratic attack on humanity had an attempt on her life which could easily have killed her but she survived due to her training etc she said. Working when probably stressed might lead to a blip.or 2 in her genius work?
One has to be doing extensive dedicated work on these topics in order to be able to draw any conclusions or be able to say that x papers match this technology. That is all most can do. People ha e touted all kinds of claims to papers and tech being the cause, but few can actually show the resemblance via hard work. We have made a very long list of observations for which have chained together nicely and revealed a flow as to which kinds of technologies may have been stitched together. Coacervates, colloidal molecules, NP's, protocells, hydrogels, microfluidics, and much more. As far as I have seen I or we are the first to show these systems in any detail at all. Shortly after making a discovery it seems others claim they found it too. But their post dates and time stamps are always behind ours ;) this is why we know that others making claims or insisting they have answers are mostly wrong. If they can't see or have not mensioned the consistent observations we have already made then they have no reference to Compare too. This js when I stopped listening to others media and decided I was learning more for myself by doing the work and not wasting my time. It's paid off, wait till you see the coming video presentations :D
I only found Ana's Substack a few months ago and have not read enough of her work probably to notice contradictions. I saw recently that she, like a few telling the truth about the global technocratic attack on humanity had an attempt on her life which could easily have killed her but she survived due to her training etc she said. Working when probably stressed might lead to a blip.or 2 in her genius work?
One has to be doing extensive dedicated work on these topics in order to be able to draw any conclusions or be able to say that x papers match this technology. That is all most can do. People ha e touted all kinds of claims to papers and tech being the cause, but few can actually show the resemblance via hard work. We have made a very long list of observations for which have chained together nicely and revealed a flow as to which kinds of technologies may have been stitched together. Coacervates, colloidal molecules, NP's, protocells, hydrogels, microfluidics, and much more. As far as I have seen I or we are the first to show these systems in any detail at all. Shortly after making a discovery it seems others claim they found it too. But their post dates and time stamps are always behind ours ;) this is why we know that others making claims or insisting they have answers are mostly wrong. If they can't see or have not mensioned the consistent observations we have already made then they have no reference to Compare too. This js when I stopped listening to others media and decided I was learning more for myself by doing the work and not wasting my time. It's paid off, wait till you see the coming video presentations :D
Your hard work is very appreciated:)