After having had a good look through the findings of LLM a couple of times over, i thought it has done a fairly accurate job in gauging whats clearly presenting in your images Karl.
Namely point 2 Observational Summary was spot on.
Generally otherwise, it hasnt missed much and seems to have drawn on a lot of your prior covered research findings and lists those possibilities well. If anything, it seems to have included for just about everything you have been studying in to up to now. Which is what you commented on as it'd
covered those ID's pretty well too.
So if i am foĺlowing correctly, its too broadly inclusive and not yet specific enough? Which is why the need is there for more sophisticated tools, to hone in on exactness of ID's., etc. in more acute refinement.
I NOTE the strong mentions overall coming through on optical features and roles likely at play.
I personally am most intrigued at the optical scope employed and feel we really need big focus on this area of mechanism to be understood, going forward. I don't know why but it bugs me a lot to try understand it better myself.
Were you happy with this exercise outcome ?
Good stuff anyhoo...🤟 i hope you have locked Ai up in the vault. KK
Karl, this is amazing work, wow, thanks to you, always
Your brilliance is only overshadowed by your enthusiasm Karl. I can feel your electrified momentum from here !
I am loving the way you stalk out what you're looking for. Your clear alignment skills to note what is needed in the first place
Is what thrills me. Man on the hunt....your processing ability
Is clearly a force to be reckoned with. I am soooo enjoying the hunt. You sir are on fire !..
Burn away..WOOHOO 🤟KK
After having had a good look through the findings of LLM a couple of times over, i thought it has done a fairly accurate job in gauging whats clearly presenting in your images Karl.
Namely point 2 Observational Summary was spot on.
Generally otherwise, it hasnt missed much and seems to have drawn on a lot of your prior covered research findings and lists those possibilities well. If anything, it seems to have included for just about everything you have been studying in to up to now. Which is what you commented on as it'd
covered those ID's pretty well too.
So if i am foĺlowing correctly, its too broadly inclusive and not yet specific enough? Which is why the need is there for more sophisticated tools, to hone in on exactness of ID's., etc. in more acute refinement.
I NOTE the strong mentions overall coming through on optical features and roles likely at play.
I personally am most intrigued at the optical scope employed and feel we really need big focus on this area of mechanism to be understood, going forward. I don't know why but it bugs me a lot to try understand it better myself.
Were you happy with this exercise outcome ?
Good stuff anyhoo...🤟 i hope you have locked Ai up in the vault. KK