If you was afraid of repercussions or threats to your life, u should not have even started publishing your studies. Now get to the bottom of it, the lives of billions of people are at stake
They don't need nano bots when they can assemble matter and Alter it as a robot would do. I am not saying they are not completely altering us, I am saying there is no evidence of nanobots while looking at samples so far. It's all complex self assembling materials which is indicated by dr speikers discovery of excess DNA. There are patents for tonnes of horrible technologies, that is not conducive that they are using them all. That's just not helpful. If they looked like robots or had actual robotic entities we would see them. Wet computing, and other transhumanist alterations require no robots, so why must their be robots? Because dr ana keeps saying robots to everything as there is patents for many kinds of robot ? Sorry what Am i missing except for where the robots are ? I'd rather robots, probably easier to eradicate than this stuff.
Hi, thank you for answering, I appreciate it very much. I can tell you what I know. I am in Italy, the homeland of Transhumanism, where it all started. I also worked during the pandemic (when all the other companies were at a standstill, because I worked in the telecommunications sector), and I discovered graphene oxide because on the label of the masks I used, its presence was written in black and white, for reasons of disinfection.
I had confirmation of the presence of nanobots myself, when I had my blood analyzed years ago, by a laboratory. I can also put the images here, but they are the same as the samples taken by Dr. Ana. That is, large bubbles, where inside there are colored dots of red, blue, purple.
In the videos posted by the doctor, these dots turn and skillfully overcome the white blood cells, and then stop after a few minutes. It is clear that these nanobots use the energy of the human body to "work", that is, they use the electromagnetic field that every human being produces.
If these dots with lights so colorful and bright as if they were Christmas trees are not nanobots, what are they? Graphene is famous for being a material that has some properties of metals, and that in aqueous solutions becomes magnetic. Graphene has been found in all vaccines and surgical masks.
That article doesn't say we put nano robots in you now and that's what your looking at, it doesn't say they have put the cancer robots in you either which were recently designed. I've seen the robots, their sizes, and microscopy. We don't see those in any samples so far, it's all self assembling molecules and chemistry.
So why lie, that you have some kind of reason to doubt what hasn't been observed yet when the current scenario is far worse….jeeze.
He is a good example of what I am talking about, people are touting baseless stuff they haven't seen in samples and it's clearly confusing even for me. Which is why I don't follow anyone else. people using terms like lamellar vesicles, lamellar hydrogels, confirmation of LNP's and other materials were spoken of here first. So if people are doubting what I've done so far by defending people who took those terms from here and added robots nd stuff to sensationaliz stuff are doing such then it can only be funny that someone is coming here to tell me I lie. I'm honest, there's been no evidence looking at samples to suggest robots at this stage.
Pannick and irrational behaviour won't help and it doesn't help me when I sit at the desk everyday trying to figure out how to do whatever I can. I've been there, it doesn't work. You'll go madder than you will get smarter or get stuff done. Like deactivating a Bomb which this is kind of is. Pannick and irrational thinking will have you looking to believe everything as you have been and leave you confused. That was partly my point. If we did that I wouldn't know as much as I do now about this stuff and that's why we need an LCMS machine asap. Everything looks like known technologies wjere self-assembly, very complex materials and alterations are formed. I don't
Achieve what I have by reading people's articles and assuming whatever they say must be true. And that is why I stopped reading dr A's stack a long time ago. Most of the stuff coming out is contradictory based on articles she reads. Not on alanysis, on assumption and desire to post something. She points at incorrect structures and calls them robots when they are no such thing. It cannot be followed because of contradiction. You maybe don't realise because it's all quite frightening I'll agree and it's all very complicated. It's broken my head and my life completely trying to trace what is actually there. As you can see I post my own work and I run you through it to some degree while I am writing up more complicated stuff and refining it. But it's so complicated and we need to prove it all as well as finding answers. I have that lined up and understand more than I have posted. But I won't post stuff that can't be fairly solidly confirmed and that's why we need more lab gear to back and enforce stuff. We can see what kind of tech is in there and how complex it is, but we don't know the molecular design or arrangement in any detail and can't without accurate chemical analysis and ssdna examination. People are working on that. Robots are the least of our worries and I hope you understand why. This stuff is far worse. It's programmed life as much as you are before you were born and then changes as you do and grow it seems. Constructors that programme matter to form or change. That's superior tech to nano robots for tranhumism and we've studied alot of papers on it. That stuff is in there but robots have not shown up. I am sorry for your worry, I worry too. But some of us have to keep cool to keep going at it. Regards and best wishes to you.
This page of reply is yet another very very clearly outlined overview of the status quo...anyone can appreciate what it is saying. Yet, each time you do this are revealing more astounding facts, at such an incredible depth of scientific understanding you have to have indeed actually "achieved" it Karl.
The fact it has cost you your life and "broken your head " tracing what "is" actually there - is shame on all of those who are automatically dissmissive of your work and findings, and content to simply throw stones, having not even qualified to be in this marathon of extreme detection, in the first place.!!
ie..." its programmed life"..." constructors that programme matter"
say what !!?
Is that graphic enough ppl ? Can you solve for x ?
Could you stare this down the barrel all day all night everyday?
What is essentially the very reason for the 2nd coming...requires nothing less.
The people who haven't found any robots.........riiighhhht. dr Anna pointed to complex meloecules we are aware of and have shown to be quite clearly hybrid lipid nanoparticles and called them robots......🤣 Dude, go follow the right people. I hope they lead you well, my family and friends are at high risk, as are my. I'm not going to point at stuff that is known and isn't robots to save my ass. I'm gonna work it off every day behind the desk as I have been doing. Not reading articles and posting them as fact while I run businesses during the day claiming to know everything without doing the work. Go follow that person please and leave the real workers in their corner. I won't mind, honest.
The images you are sharing are snapshots taken from 30,000 feet allowing no conclusions to be drawn regarding nanobots that have a diameter starting at 1-5 nanometers. You are saying that there are no butterflies on the planet, because you cannot see them from the International Space Station looking at the window. We are to prepare for the worst-case scenario. Right? The worst-case scenario is that the VAX includes hydrogels and nanofibers and nanobots that AI manipulates for transforming human beings into Borg (half-human/half-machine lifeforms). AI manipulates the nanobots inside our bodies via the digital space-based HAARP Carrier Wave onto which AI creates billions of sub-frequencies.
Billy Hayes built 200 of the HAARP facilities around the world and he sat me down and explained what is happening now more than a decade ago. Begin here (https://terral.substack.com/p/using-our-nano-silver-video-part) and follow the breadcrumb trail to the truth and get prepared before it is too late.
The scientific evidence of this authors research and many others, shows no evidence thus far, that of being nanorobotics at play, over the well observed and documented actual symphony of newly captured nefariously designed processes well underway to being not only understood, but found to be well established purposefully designed and crafted to do great harm to the human design.
My sincerest recommendation for you is to look a little further, dig lot deeper and prepare to be even more shocked at what the truth
from this answer of yours I understand that you didn't even open the link I posted, I repeat leave me alone, let the creator of the post speak, let him intervene, don't act like a lawyer, you're not paid to do it, forget it. If you want to read about nanobots, read here and I repeat leave me alone, give space to the creator of this substack, let him comment and let's see if he'll answer
Any idea what standard lab test anomalies may be present with contaminated blood? My platelet levels have been consistently low for the last several months. Are platelets more susceptible to the crap you are finding in the blood? I took no Konvid vax but I did “contract” the poisoning Nov. of 2020. Thanks for your input Karl.
Hi Diane, I have seen way less platelets over time, even when I stain samples. But I often see largely elevated white cells counts that fluctuate. Quite a few people have this I've seen and there will be losing white cells chomping on impossible solid materials such as polymers before they eventually die on the slide.
Hmmm, my eosinophils were elevated on my last blood draw, too. Maybe something going on there? I have no allergies, skin rashes, etc. so that makes me curious. Thank you for answering.
Also the graphene I inhaled, from those masks where it was written in black and white on the label that graphene was present, they created a possible amyloidosis, the symptoms are those.
Reminds me of ppl scared to death during the scamdemic who believed "covid-19" was a deadly, global epidemic "because people are dying". Yeah, dying of the bioweapon that Karl C and colleagues are trying to decipher with an open mind. What if some of the papers Dr. Ana cites have been planted to deceive independent research?
Chlorine dioxide helps at low amounts and with breaks. It is mildly effective against lipids,LNP's and temporary disruption of hydrogels. However, it must never touch metals and is quite aggressive. Sodium citrate has been one of the best things I found, and charcoal. Search sodium citrate on my stack for 3 articles. It has massive life changing effects for me so interesting to read about as I don't give medical advice. NAC does help detoxing In Larger doses, resveratrol and quercetin also have effects against lipids. Turmeric, Curcumin, ginger, pineapple may all have some beneficial enzymes that could possibly slow or deform some lipids formations. For Curcumin and turmeric studies showed higher doses were necessary. But again, just my research, not advice 😉
Thanks!! I will look into the sodium citrate... sounds pretty benign... mag citrate certainly is, eh? Any recommended doses? No, I will NOT take as medical advice, just as info! :-)
I would have thought the enzymes lumbrokinase and/or serrapeptase would have some effects... no?
I am not jabbed and am unsure about "shedding"... but best safe than sorry... !!
Hybridized lipid particles. I'm definately not using poisoned pharma products with more of the same stuff in it to chelates the same stuff out of my body. Part of it will already be attached to the EDTA blocking it up. We haven't found any pharma products or saline IV to be anything but packed with nano. I doubt they are making dr ana nano free pharma EDTA just for her. I stick to the stuff I know is clean like charcoal, sodium citrate, NAC, quercetin, resveratrol, h202 chlorine dioxide, high doses of turmeric or Curcumin, tonnes of ginger, etc. most of those things have lipid inhibitors, oxide LNP's and metal core particles, and affect hydrogels. And many papers back that. Quercetin, resveratrol, and Curcumin or termeric have lipid inhibiting properties. I'm done touching any pharma products, it's them who did this.
Maybe the nanobots are synthesized? Think I remember reading that. They just don't appear . If there are any. The syn bio and tech overlay over lap. The syn bio aspect/ researchers get less support and its also more difficult. Dr ana usually is gracious and gives credit. With Karl having done this work - if she uses it- it would be appropriate for her to note that . Maybe someone else can address it on her stack. Clear the bad blood.
It is okay, I don't mind. I am more concerned that we are all cautious telling people what it is we have actually seen or confirmed anywhere in the world and what is just an interesting paper to view. We can't be confused about what we are dealing with. It is possible that robots could be in the material, but as of yet we can see direct alteration processes to blood cells and other complex pathways occuring. Just that none has the right to say there is robots in there untill there is SEM images of such from a reasonably credible source or any source really.untill then, it is just conjecture or worse. A myth even. It's either found or it's not quite simply. That's how I do my work and even I was sketchier in the earlier days before learning as much as I have now. With it comes caution on what I personally except I think I am seeing. And I usually only say something when that thing is repeatable. Shhh.... I was originally a dr ana fan until I learnt more and more about this stuff and spent every minute working on it, but when I started to not be able to follow her posts or thread stuff together I gave up. It's not personal, it's just how I do my work. I am absolutely sure I've made mistakes, but I try to improve and stay true to my goals by learning from my mistakes. I used to get very excited 2 years ago when dr ana did an interview and watch it. But none of it helps me now not knowing what's useful and what's over dramatised or even what's going to be the name of the same thing next month in her videos and stacks. Very confusing. All these materials we spotted so far are known to be intehratable stages of synthetic unpacking material. And AI all though partly a trap identified same conclusions a what I had drawn from hard watching, experimenting, and paper searching to match. So I believe I am on the right tracks vaguely at least. Nothing else anybody has come up with seems to have a flow or even makes sense as a scalable and integrative model. Like this does. But I still don't know how complex this stuff is programmed to be at the other end. None of us can at this point in time. An LCMS machine will certainly turn my work into new directions in tandem with all the visual nd dye work we have done so far.
maybe try 2 follow her she did great work- but its mostly tech missing synbio they go together but I gotta go could barely read these comments well- enough. take care. it wrong I think for her to take and not cite proper credit.
Mostly nanoparticles like quantum dots and hybrid-lipid nanoparticles have those features. They are moving by Brownian motion which also aids assembly by collision. But they are definately not robots, the form into other structures which my work has been showing over and over for some time.
blocked meaning cant comment there? dont need to question motives either or b too insulting. - actually i do remember some questioning her motives- were they blocked from commenting?
Even Terral who's just visited. In the comments here, had the same weird 360° done to him by Dr Ana when he was sharing info...she stops communicating literally and leaves ppl hanging without any further contact. It's a strange behaviour. This is the same I have seen repeated with more than a few ppl I think either or both.
Since I joined her forum in summer 2023, Dr Ana does not answer comments. I only managed to get thru personally because I facilitated her contact with a scientist. Still she later left me hanging after siding with gatekeepers of La Quinta Columna's "graphene" hoopla even when I showed her in private email that there was only 0.07% of graphene in the single Pfizer vial examined, instead of "98 to 99%".
Thankyou for your kindness and civility Karl. The masses are pannicked, and on the attack.
Don' t take too much of it on board mate, we need your precious drive for the truth continue soaring those lofty heights of techno menace madnesses...scaled, exposed and conquered ! 💙 KK
You know what, I realise I am about tense lately too with all that we see and I'll people increasing around us too. I worry about everyone as much as I do me, actually others more so would you believe. There are so many good and deserving people out there and they shouldn't have to experience this uncertainty for themselves or their lives ones. For this I have lost patience with rude, or silly people and need to calm the farm just a tad maybe, I am usually far more forgiving of stuff but lately feel as much a victim as anyone else, and that's fine untill someone steps on you without being reasonable 3 times a day🤣 we all need to keep calm and carry on as they say! We are all in this together still.
You are one fine human being mate, the trouble is if you arent careful with the justifiable rage, it can be your demise, and we dont want to see that happen. I always saw this time coming. The waves and waves of ppl just starting to think somethings up? Oh my...and who do they all want answers from?.. the ones already having done the hard yards for years, who paid attention and doing everything in their power to find answers. Like a massive car pileup on a freeway. Shake it off baby! ..shake it off . You cant carry all that alone Karl, so dont.
May God bless you and keep you strong as ever for the journey ahead, much love 💙KK
Indeed I have had enough, but can't stop. I sometimes lay in bed struggling to sleep because my days work is going over my head and at the same time I am very tired of seeing the blood get worse even after finding things that helped so much we know more about what this stuff looks like than its molecular programming. That doesn't help, but I will get that machine soon !!!! And we will find more clues I am very sure.
Actually it is required in most self-assembling packages. It is the container and holds constructors also. It can be aerosolized, put in water, injected, and as you say can play a part in tissues scaffolding and other far more advanced technologies. Effectively in skin repair products I believe it is supposed to deliver otheraterials and provide temporary bandage or strapping if you like. Eventually it is supposed to shed out of the skin leaving you with good tissue. Not in all cases and I am sure that there are nefarious version which stay in the tissues. All creepy though, say no to hydrogel full stop for anything of course.
You just exposed yourself as a shrill with your latest cross post hit which was ridiculously dumb. I never stated any of the things you are advertising and shall do a stream video and post highlighting your moves and my previous takes on what was just quoted. You are clearly a missinfo or disinformation type person or someone who jumps to multiple conclusions because you don't listen. I know stuff about the towers you don't, and they are most likely involved. I never stated AI wasn't involved, you just don't understand what I am saying or what your talking about apparently. On comes the Terral clown video coming in the near future. La Quinta get clowned hard core , now you've just put your ticket. If you want to be a silly clown then I can do better!
Batchlets presentation was in 2015, I’ve also seen the documents through Ana Maria Mihalceas substack entitled,
“ National Nanotechnology Initiative Specifically Speaks of Covid 19 Bioweapons As "Nano Technology Enabled" And Plans Many More Nanotechnological "Vaccines" by,
- ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
Although the elitists as you calle them, use subversive terms and language to obfuscate reality, that holds little weight to the documents/evidence that this DOCUMENT BELOW contains - it may assist somehow perhaps in the quest to find a viable and timely solution is what I’d think? Correct me if I’m wrong!
Do you have the original document source I can't download ? Thank you.
Technically the Pfizer mRNA design would be nanotechnology, but not as complicated as what we are really seeing. So far creating LLM vectors for AI to review the work we already did without telling what we summized it confirmed that it thought it was seeing all the same types of material and self assembly stuff. It concluded in the end that vaccines using mRNA would not look like or have the features shown in all the work I've done so far. It agreed there are complex colloidal networks, lamellar structures, varying lipids, metallic nano particles of hybrid nature and more. All these things were mentioned first on my stack from my research work. We know vaguely what they have done in terms of tech and most of it seems like synthetic biology approach of alteration and nano assembly. Which of course needs no robots. All synthetic or mimetic biology is classed as nanotechnology as much as making gold in a dish using similar constructs or making self-assembling cell structures like lipids and vesicles. I can see why people are confused since others are jumping to conclusions and quoting stuff from all kinds of random tech papers and robots without having seen or observed any of these things closely. So far all materials are assembling via Brownian motion and nothing as yet moves robotically or is shaped like a robot.
I do not, I did have it at the time I read the article but must’ve somehow misplaced it here. Ask Ana for it!
Thanks for clarifying what we know so far, everyone is watching, in fact I’ve been following your work now for some time because of Ana.
So,
A brilliant researcher named Brandon Iglesias from substack has this website linked below regarding the removal of what he refers to as “Xi’s Magic Weapon” or,
Wetware spy-bots. He was allegedly targeted with this very system we’re trying to decipher here with all of our work, you included Karl. The problem is it’s outside of anyone who hasn’t worked with this (DOD) technology’s scope.
That being said, if he isn’t lying, then he has made some very considerable strides forward in his research, please see his work!
Krappykunt? Who are you referring to , perhaps you are unable to be more clear - what “character” are you referencing? Nobody’s talking to you btw, I was speaking to Karl.
I think partly we see what we're conditioned to see. Isn't this quantum something or other? The observer influences the observed. On a more mundane level, we're told we all seek out articles and writers who will most likely support or write in accordance with our beliefs on any issue like national affairs; economic policies; etc.
I think something along these lines is happening with interpreting what's seen in the blood or substance being analyzed.
I'm also suspicious that the very people who concocted whatever everyone is seeing don't know much about their own research. They put on blinders to manipulate their tiny piece of reality to produce a particular effect. This kind of observation results from a mechanistic framework to interpret the world. Maybe, as some suggested in the comments, once we begin tampering with DNA, which is also light which is also knowledge, sound, and vibration, this technology is far beyond current understanding either in humans or AI.
In looking for a very long time at one of Dr. Nixon's weird slides when he asked his readers what we thought might be happening, it looked to me like the "thing" existed and then didn't exist. In "not existing," it existed still, but it wasn't "there" in visual comprehension. You had to "sense" it. I could "see" it living and breathing.
So, who knows?
Childers column this week referenced a DARPA announcement hiring scientists to study how to get rid of mRNA in the human body such as mRNA acquired via a biologic weapon. I don't think they truly understand anything. They released a half-assed unknown quantity and have no clue how it interacts with the human body. They think they know, but they don't because they're largely driven by ego rather true scientific investigation. The human genetic body is complex, and even mental and emotional responses greatly affect the outcome in disease and illness.
Just a quick question. You mention Dr David Nixon fondly—I am very fond of him too, he like you, is a hero—but my question is, surely you’ve seen his footage of what looks like an arm(?) assembling a structure? I ask because in that video, Dr Nixon calls it a nanobot.
Are we just mincing semantics here? As mentioned above, Carnicom calls it cross domain bacteria, Hildegarde Staninger calls them mesogens.
Hi there we do discuss the most appropriate descriptions of things...robot arms is our affectionate term, we do not know these features to actually be robotic...we question it a lot. We revisit this footage a lot too, it holds clues to something we all see.but dont yet know. Hope this helps you.
I think it's healthy to openly and loosely accept multiple perspectives and not get too entrenched in any specific interpretation. I'm conscious that there's much division within the live blood microscopy world, particularly over the nature of what we're seeing. Divide and conquer to scupper our honest endeavours maybe?
I know that Dr. Ana Mihalcea asserts 'robots' and similar nanotech terminology, based on her reading of industry research papers and particularly the work of Dr. Hildegarde Staninger - and also her clinical observations. It's her personal perspective and professional assertion, which I tend to strongly agree with. However, perhaps she goes too far for many people and asserts a position that cannot yet be tangibly proven. It's an ASSERTION, however, made in good faith, I believe, nothing more. And in dark times of encroaching totalitarian tyranny.
I've often deferred to Dr. Mihalcea for plausible interpretations regarding the 'construction site' micellular formations and the polymer filaments and their approximate possible chemical make-up. I have adopted a similar language to some modest extent in order to explain what I'm seeing. However, I have yet to be persuaded by autonomous robots (the 'generals' as she calls them). I don't see such things robotically meandering in my blood samples - at least that's been my current interpretation as a citizen amateur microscopist. Sometimes they do seem suspiciously robotic and autonomous though. I see them meandering and mechanically moving but am not persuaded (so far) that they are 'robots' - they seem more like synthetic chemistry particle flows.
I think a lot gets lost in translation through the use of nanotech terminology, 'computers' and 'robots' which can mean different things to different people.
I don't think that it's necessarily harmful (in this malevolent nanotech age) to assert the presence of nano/micro 'bots' as a generic description. We need more people to wake up and get involved! People should use their discernment and make up their own minds, agree or disagree. If we have to walk on egg shells (in an already oppressive Orwellian world) in our free expression or assertion of what we honestly think we're seeing under the microscope, we will be self-censoring and tying ourselves in more knots unnecessarily.
Personally, I've often felt guilty for daring to use the term 'Triffids' (in some of my past posts) to humorously (and honestly) describe the polymer filaments found in my blood. It might offend some people as being too light-hearted and trite. It's just poetic license in dire depressing dystopian times to describe the horrors of what we routinely see under the microscope in blood, urine, water and elsewhere.
I suppose inevitably we all form variations of interpretation and differing degrees of assertion as so what we're seeing under the 'scope. It's a big tent we're all in. Surely, we can agree or respectfully disagree on multiple angles and evolving conclusions?
Thanks for all your hard work and dedication, Karl. It is greatly appreciated. I can understand the frustration you must feel from all the differing factions of opinion being expressed, often with angry exasperation and irritation. I'm glad I'm in the slow lane with a mere trickle of subscribers! Best wishes to you. Carry on regardless!
Hey Nigel long time no see.....your last paragraph struck the right chord with me, keep up with the lighter humorous side of it, triffid fan mself. Good to hear from you
Yes, I still quite like the term 'Triffids' as an apt description of the ropey polymer filaments. They do look alien, or botanical twig-like hybrids maybe! Lots of hairy tentacles sprouting out in all directions. Yum! If we don't keep our spontaneous sense of humour we become like the cold callous transhumanist Machine and all things fake, synthetic and coded.
Jason Whalen (reported for his offensive remarks) see way below
Koppykat
While most intelligent lifeforms saw my general warning comment was directly beneath the person you had just promoted and was non-identifying, non-defamatory yet clear to be wary of based on ppl's own assessment...even the emoji was switched on enough and took notice...
You claim i was interrupting "your" conversation with Karl, where ?! To be clear this is the authors domain, not ours.
Completely unprovoked your true character showed addressing me in the acutely inappropriate
way labelling me using the very language of violent out of control males who subjugate, diminish and destroy women outright.
In this country you can be arrested for use of such an expression considered equal to physical acts of assault, it is the male calling card indicator of utter contempt of women outright, by males who carry out their deaths.
I hope you have a good pair of running shoes on....for when Karl sees this. 🤨 KK
Fairly off-thread. For people buying a microscope for LBA, I suspect my A$500 microscope is worthless for this. We know emfs cause Rouleaux, and looking at a friend's blood, I had about 15 seconds of seeing her rbcs free-floating before they stacked into Rouleaux. I suspect the light source. An LBA using a $25k dark field Olympus did not see my rbcs anywhere near as stacked as my Prism Optical E3.
p.s. The Brisbane rep did say it was no good for RBA after I'd bought it. Lesson: know what questions to ask...
Just an update on the shedding. I have been the canary-in-the-cave for sure on this one. Truly allergic to the 20th century chems and toxins, I have made note it's been a huge time now of no reaction had out in public settings of any effect I have previously had instant (crippling unbearable migraine)
Which is a true gauge of less ppl jabbing at all, or, that phase of attack has played it's part. Weeks ago, there it was so acutely someone sat close by...instant killer migraine uniquely identifiable as per before..struck me down. Exact same reaction. All my siblings jabbed, was deadly affect to even b anywhere near them.
Same crippling migraine. Not there anymore. Glad about it. KK
why lie that nanobots are not involved? did they threaten you?
Assange was talking about evil smart dust, patents on nanobots, made of dna, can be found everywhere online https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-1000847295
If you was afraid of repercussions or threats to your life, u should not have even started publishing your studies. Now get to the bottom of it, the lives of billions of people are at stake
They don't need nano bots when they can assemble matter and Alter it as a robot would do. I am not saying they are not completely altering us, I am saying there is no evidence of nanobots while looking at samples so far. It's all complex self assembling materials which is indicated by dr speikers discovery of excess DNA. There are patents for tonnes of horrible technologies, that is not conducive that they are using them all. That's just not helpful. If they looked like robots or had actual robotic entities we would see them. Wet computing, and other transhumanist alterations require no robots, so why must their be robots? Because dr ana keeps saying robots to everything as there is patents for many kinds of robot ? Sorry what Am i missing except for where the robots are ? I'd rather robots, probably easier to eradicate than this stuff.
Hi, thank you for answering, I appreciate it very much. I can tell you what I know. I am in Italy, the homeland of Transhumanism, where it all started. I also worked during the pandemic (when all the other companies were at a standstill, because I worked in the telecommunications sector), and I discovered graphene oxide because on the label of the masks I used, its presence was written in black and white, for reasons of disinfection.
In this video, Cingolani, former minister of the Draghi government, talks about nanotechnologies, based on iron oxide. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alh2LDdpH9w
I had confirmation of the presence of nanobots myself, when I had my blood analyzed years ago, by a laboratory. I can also put the images here, but they are the same as the samples taken by Dr. Ana. That is, large bubbles, where inside there are colored dots of red, blue, purple.
In the videos posted by the doctor, these dots turn and skillfully overcome the white blood cells, and then stop after a few minutes. It is clear that these nanobots use the energy of the human body to "work", that is, they use the electromagnetic field that every human being produces.
If these dots with lights so colorful and bright as if they were Christmas trees are not nanobots, what are they? Graphene is famous for being a material that has some properties of metals, and that in aqueous solutions becomes magnetic. Graphene has been found in all vaccines and surgical masks.
That article doesn't say we put nano robots in you now and that's what your looking at, it doesn't say they have put the cancer robots in you either which were recently designed. I've seen the robots, their sizes, and microscopy. We don't see those in any samples so far, it's all self assembling molecules and chemistry.
So why lie, that you have some kind of reason to doubt what hasn't been observed yet when the current scenario is far worse….jeeze.
A perfect example of a very rude indescribable ogre you are sir. Get some manners already. Someone show this...this
I don't know what...
the door!
He is a good example of what I am talking about, people are touting baseless stuff they haven't seen in samples and it's clearly confusing even for me. Which is why I don't follow anyone else. people using terms like lamellar vesicles, lamellar hydrogels, confirmation of LNP's and other materials were spoken of here first. So if people are doubting what I've done so far by defending people who took those terms from here and added robots nd stuff to sensationaliz stuff are doing such then it can only be funny that someone is coming here to tell me I lie. I'm honest, there's been no evidence looking at samples to suggest robots at this stage.
It's that circular stupidity again.
Oh i wish with all my heart it was just robots too, ditto on the fix
KK
every minute that passes people die and you're still having to deal with good or bad manners......
Pannick and irrational behaviour won't help and it doesn't help me when I sit at the desk everyday trying to figure out how to do whatever I can. I've been there, it doesn't work. You'll go madder than you will get smarter or get stuff done. Like deactivating a Bomb which this is kind of is. Pannick and irrational thinking will have you looking to believe everything as you have been and leave you confused. That was partly my point. If we did that I wouldn't know as much as I do now about this stuff and that's why we need an LCMS machine asap. Everything looks like known technologies wjere self-assembly, very complex materials and alterations are formed. I don't
Achieve what I have by reading people's articles and assuming whatever they say must be true. And that is why I stopped reading dr A's stack a long time ago. Most of the stuff coming out is contradictory based on articles she reads. Not on alanysis, on assumption and desire to post something. She points at incorrect structures and calls them robots when they are no such thing. It cannot be followed because of contradiction. You maybe don't realise because it's all quite frightening I'll agree and it's all very complicated. It's broken my head and my life completely trying to trace what is actually there. As you can see I post my own work and I run you through it to some degree while I am writing up more complicated stuff and refining it. But it's so complicated and we need to prove it all as well as finding answers. I have that lined up and understand more than I have posted. But I won't post stuff that can't be fairly solidly confirmed and that's why we need more lab gear to back and enforce stuff. We can see what kind of tech is in there and how complex it is, but we don't know the molecular design or arrangement in any detail and can't without accurate chemical analysis and ssdna examination. People are working on that. Robots are the least of our worries and I hope you understand why. This stuff is far worse. It's programmed life as much as you are before you were born and then changes as you do and grow it seems. Constructors that programme matter to form or change. That's superior tech to nano robots for tranhumism and we've studied alot of papers on it. That stuff is in there but robots have not shown up. I am sorry for your worry, I worry too. But some of us have to keep cool to keep going at it. Regards and best wishes to you.
This page of reply is yet another very very clearly outlined overview of the status quo...anyone can appreciate what it is saying. Yet, each time you do this are revealing more astounding facts, at such an incredible depth of scientific understanding you have to have indeed actually "achieved" it Karl.
The fact it has cost you your life and "broken your head " tracing what "is" actually there - is shame on all of those who are automatically dissmissive of your work and findings, and content to simply throw stones, having not even qualified to be in this marathon of extreme detection, in the first place.!!
ie..." its programmed life"..." constructors that programme matter"
say what !!?
Is that graphic enough ppl ? Can you solve for x ?
Could you stare this down the barrel all day all night everyday?
What is essentially the very reason for the 2nd coming...requires nothing less.
With extreme graditude Karl,...we owe you. 😌 KK
You served an unjustified misdirected blow on this authors person as though you hold him responsible for the crimes of others against humanity.
You sir are an ignorant thug.
saying now that nanobots are not in play is to be in bad faith. Then think about it as you want, let the right people intervene.
The people who haven't found any robots.........riiighhhht. dr Anna pointed to complex meloecules we are aware of and have shown to be quite clearly hybrid lipid nanoparticles and called them robots......🤣 Dude, go follow the right people. I hope they lead you well, my family and friends are at high risk, as are my. I'm not going to point at stuff that is known and isn't robots to save my ass. I'm gonna work it off every day behind the desk as I have been doing. Not reading articles and posting them as fact while I run businesses during the day claiming to know everything without doing the work. Go follow that person please and leave the real workers in their corner. I won't mind, honest.
The images you are sharing are snapshots taken from 30,000 feet allowing no conclusions to be drawn regarding nanobots that have a diameter starting at 1-5 nanometers. You are saying that there are no butterflies on the planet, because you cannot see them from the International Space Station looking at the window. We are to prepare for the worst-case scenario. Right? The worst-case scenario is that the VAX includes hydrogels and nanofibers and nanobots that AI manipulates for transforming human beings into Borg (half-human/half-machine lifeforms). AI manipulates the nanobots inside our bodies via the digital space-based HAARP Carrier Wave onto which AI creates billions of sub-frequencies.
https://terral.substack.com/p/billy-hayes-elana-freeland-terral
Billy Hayes built 200 of the HAARP facilities around the world and he sat me down and explained what is happening now more than a decade ago. Begin here (https://terral.substack.com/p/using-our-nano-silver-video-part) and follow the breadcrumb trail to the truth and get prepared before it is too late.
Show us your proof of the existence of robots involved and we'll talk.
The scientific evidence of this authors research and many others, shows no evidence thus far, that of being nanorobotics at play, over the well observed and documented actual symphony of newly captured nefariously designed processes well underway to being not only understood, but found to be well established purposefully designed and crafted to do great harm to the human design.
My sincerest recommendation for you is to look a little further, dig lot deeper and prepare to be even more shocked at what the truth
actually looks like. KK
from this answer of yours I understand that you didn't even open the link I posted, I repeat leave me alone, let the creator of the post speak, let him intervene, don't act like a lawyer, you're not paid to do it, forget it. If you want to read about nanobots, read here and I repeat leave me alone, give space to the creator of this substack, let him comment and let's see if he'll answer
https://substack.com/home/post/p-152046986
Ask Ido Bachelet, if nanobots aren't involved
Here ya go, otherwise would never use wickedpedia for information,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanorobotics
Any idea what standard lab test anomalies may be present with contaminated blood? My platelet levels have been consistently low for the last several months. Are platelets more susceptible to the crap you are finding in the blood? I took no Konvid vax but I did “contract” the poisoning Nov. of 2020. Thanks for your input Karl.
Hi Diane, I have seen way less platelets over time, even when I stain samples. But I often see largely elevated white cells counts that fluctuate. Quite a few people have this I've seen and there will be losing white cells chomping on impossible solid materials such as polymers before they eventually die on the slide.
Hmmm, my eosinophils were elevated on my last blood draw, too. Maybe something going on there? I have no allergies, skin rashes, etc. so that makes me curious. Thank you for answering.
I ordered sodium citrate, I hope it helps.
Also the graphene I inhaled, from those masks where it was written in black and white on the label that graphene was present, they created a possible amyloidosis, the symptoms are those.
Thats an interesting skew i havent heard raised before, a good question too, one i'd like to know too. Could be significant clues. KK
Reminds me of ppl scared to death during the scamdemic who believed "covid-19" was a deadly, global epidemic "because people are dying". Yeah, dying of the bioweapon that Karl C and colleagues are trying to decipher with an open mind. What if some of the papers Dr. Ana cites have been planted to deceive independent research?
What is the best way to rid oneself of this stuff?
I wonder of Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) would do it? Methylene blue? Lumbrokinase? Serrapeptase? Zeolite?
Chlorine dioxide helps at low amounts and with breaks. It is mildly effective against lipids,LNP's and temporary disruption of hydrogels. However, it must never touch metals and is quite aggressive. Sodium citrate has been one of the best things I found, and charcoal. Search sodium citrate on my stack for 3 articles. It has massive life changing effects for me so interesting to read about as I don't give medical advice. NAC does help detoxing In Larger doses, resveratrol and quercetin also have effects against lipids. Turmeric, Curcumin, ginger, pineapple may all have some beneficial enzymes that could possibly slow or deform some lipids formations. For Curcumin and turmeric studies showed higher doses were necessary. But again, just my research, not advice 😉
Thanks!! I will look into the sodium citrate... sounds pretty benign... mag citrate certainly is, eh? Any recommended doses? No, I will NOT take as medical advice, just as info! :-)
I would have thought the enzymes lumbrokinase and/or serrapeptase would have some effects... no?
I am not jabbed and am unsure about "shedding"... but best safe than sorry... !!
Lunbrokinase was more effective but more expensive. Ron D Norris did alot of detailed work showing some inhibition of polymerizing or clotting.
Great, thx!
Ginger, NAC strong antioxidants. Is this the pathway ?
what about lipsomal EDTA with calcium as advised by Dr. Group. Global Healing.? Global Healing has an entire protocol.
What are the blinking colored dots everyone is seeing?
Hybridized lipid particles. I'm definately not using poisoned pharma products with more of the same stuff in it to chelates the same stuff out of my body. Part of it will already be attached to the EDTA blocking it up. We haven't found any pharma products or saline IV to be anything but packed with nano. I doubt they are making dr ana nano free pharma EDTA just for her. I stick to the stuff I know is clean like charcoal, sodium citrate, NAC, quercetin, resveratrol, h202 chlorine dioxide, high doses of turmeric or Curcumin, tonnes of ginger, etc. most of those things have lipid inhibitors, oxide LNP's and metal core particles, and affect hydrogels. And many papers back that. Quercetin, resveratrol, and Curcumin or termeric have lipid inhibiting properties. I'm done touching any pharma products, it's them who did this.
Do you know of Dr. Group & his company Global Healing? He works with Dr. Ardis.
Supposedly his products are clean including
Hello, if i may, one of our researchers in US has looked into it and many other products here is the site: https://unhackableanimal.substack.com
Covers exact info you are looking for, many topics, check archived articles. KK
oops, including lipsomal .edta.
They said combined with DMSA it cleared the blood.
where are you finding clean NAC, Resveratrol, quercetin? Im in the USA.
Maybe the nanobots are synthesized? Think I remember reading that. They just don't appear . If there are any. The syn bio and tech overlay over lap. The syn bio aspect/ researchers get less support and its also more difficult. Dr ana usually is gracious and gives credit. With Karl having done this work - if she uses it- it would be appropriate for her to note that . Maybe someone else can address it on her stack. Clear the bad blood.
It is okay, I don't mind. I am more concerned that we are all cautious telling people what it is we have actually seen or confirmed anywhere in the world and what is just an interesting paper to view. We can't be confused about what we are dealing with. It is possible that robots could be in the material, but as of yet we can see direct alteration processes to blood cells and other complex pathways occuring. Just that none has the right to say there is robots in there untill there is SEM images of such from a reasonably credible source or any source really.untill then, it is just conjecture or worse. A myth even. It's either found or it's not quite simply. That's how I do my work and even I was sketchier in the earlier days before learning as much as I have now. With it comes caution on what I personally except I think I am seeing. And I usually only say something when that thing is repeatable. Shhh.... I was originally a dr ana fan until I learnt more and more about this stuff and spent every minute working on it, but when I started to not be able to follow her posts or thread stuff together I gave up. It's not personal, it's just how I do my work. I am absolutely sure I've made mistakes, but I try to improve and stay true to my goals by learning from my mistakes. I used to get very excited 2 years ago when dr ana did an interview and watch it. But none of it helps me now not knowing what's useful and what's over dramatised or even what's going to be the name of the same thing next month in her videos and stacks. Very confusing. All these materials we spotted so far are known to be intehratable stages of synthetic unpacking material. And AI all though partly a trap identified same conclusions a what I had drawn from hard watching, experimenting, and paper searching to match. So I believe I am on the right tracks vaguely at least. Nothing else anybody has come up with seems to have a flow or even makes sense as a scalable and integrative model. Like this does. But I still don't know how complex this stuff is programmed to be at the other end. None of us can at this point in time. An LCMS machine will certainly turn my work into new directions in tandem with all the visual nd dye work we have done so far.
Regards and thanks
maybe try 2 follow her she did great work- but its mostly tech missing synbio they go together but I gotta go could barely read these comments well- enough. take care. it wrong I think for her to take and not cite proper credit.
If not robots what are all the metals found in people's urine caused by?
Mostly nanoparticles like quantum dots and hybrid-lipid nanoparticles have those features. They are moving by Brownian motion which also aids assembly by collision. But they are definately not robots, the form into other structures which my work has been showing over and over for some time.
Nice idea but others have tried and they get blocked if they question her motives. ie no reply KK
blocked meaning cant comment there? dont need to question motives either or b too insulting. - actually i do remember some questioning her motives- were they blocked from commenting?
Even Terral who's just visited. In the comments here, had the same weird 360° done to him by Dr Ana when he was sharing info...she stops communicating literally and leaves ppl hanging without any further contact. It's a strange behaviour. This is the same I have seen repeated with more than a few ppl I think either or both.
Since I joined her forum in summer 2023, Dr Ana does not answer comments. I only managed to get thru personally because I facilitated her contact with a scientist. Still she later left me hanging after siding with gatekeepers of La Quinta Columna's "graphene" hoopla even when I showed her in private email that there was only 0.07% of graphene in the single Pfizer vial examined, instead of "98 to 99%".
self propelled microrobots made of graphene quantum dots have been synthesized and xplored as biocarriers toward optical monitoring of DNA.
bacteria as living microrobots/ engineered bacteria hybrid microrobots. the syn bio/ tech overlay overlap synthesis?
Thankyou for your kindness and civility Karl. The masses are pannicked, and on the attack.
Don' t take too much of it on board mate, we need your precious drive for the truth continue soaring those lofty heights of techno menace madnesses...scaled, exposed and conquered ! 💙 KK
You know what, I realise I am about tense lately too with all that we see and I'll people increasing around us too. I worry about everyone as much as I do me, actually others more so would you believe. There are so many good and deserving people out there and they shouldn't have to experience this uncertainty for themselves or their lives ones. For this I have lost patience with rude, or silly people and need to calm the farm just a tad maybe, I am usually far more forgiving of stuff but lately feel as much a victim as anyone else, and that's fine untill someone steps on you without being reasonable 3 times a day🤣 we all need to keep calm and carry on as they say! We are all in this together still.
You are one fine human being mate, the trouble is if you arent careful with the justifiable rage, it can be your demise, and we dont want to see that happen. I always saw this time coming. The waves and waves of ppl just starting to think somethings up? Oh my...and who do they all want answers from?.. the ones already having done the hard yards for years, who paid attention and doing everything in their power to find answers. Like a massive car pileup on a freeway. Shake it off baby! ..shake it off . You cant carry all that alone Karl, so dont.
May God bless you and keep you strong as ever for the journey ahead, much love 💙KK
This stuff makes you fantasticly sick doesnt it.
Indeed I have had enough, but can't stop. I sometimes lay in bed struggling to sleep because my days work is going over my head and at the same time I am very tired of seeing the blood get worse even after finding things that helped so much we know more about what this stuff looks like than its molecular programming. That doesn't help, but I will get that machine soon !!!! And we will find more clues I am very sure.
purpose- of hydrogel is probably electronic skin[ sensors] -
Actually it is required in most self-assembling packages. It is the container and holds constructors also. It can be aerosolized, put in water, injected, and as you say can play a part in tissues scaffolding and other far more advanced technologies. Effectively in skin repair products I believe it is supposed to deliver otheraterials and provide temporary bandage or strapping if you like. Eventually it is supposed to shed out of the skin leaving you with good tissue. Not in all cases and I am sure that there are nefarious version which stay in the tissues. All creepy though, say no to hydrogel full stop for anything of course.
Hi Karl: Thank you for sharing Kelly's images. Your post is cross-posted here: https://terral.substack.com/cp/152097460 There is much more going on here than meets the eye. The SARS-VAX Binary Bioweapon components are AI-assisted and will be activated using a series of electromagnetic pulses. Deborah Tavares explains here (Page 93 of the NASA Warfare 2025.PDF): https://terral.substack.com/p/nasa-future-strategic-issueswarfare Check out my interview connecting the dots here: https://terral.substack.com/p/watch-the-full-tv-version-of-terrals Dr. Nicholas Corrin writes about how to remove the nano components from your body here: https://terral.substack.com/cp/149970814 His Live or Perish post is here: https://terral.substack.com/cp/149460778 My How To post is here: https://terral.substack.com/p/how-to-purchase-mix-use-and-store Get more information at https://www.terral03.com and at https:terral.substack.com terral@terral03.com
You just exposed yourself as a shrill with your latest cross post hit which was ridiculously dumb. I never stated any of the things you are advertising and shall do a stream video and post highlighting your moves and my previous takes on what was just quoted. You are clearly a missinfo or disinformation type person or someone who jumps to multiple conclusions because you don't listen. I know stuff about the towers you don't, and they are most likely involved. I never stated AI wasn't involved, you just don't understand what I am saying or what your talking about apparently. On comes the Terral clown video coming in the near future. La Quinta get clowned hard core , now you've just put your ticket. If you want to be a silly clown then I can do better!
Mate, can you expand on the LQC reference ?
It was only a matter of time
What a rude hijacking of another author's work then placing a badge of your own upon their work, and giving their credibility of claims a swipe at !
Rude as hell Terral.
Will check it out when I'm in the lab again tomorrow. I'll put it on the side of the screen. Struggling to multitask at the moment. Thank you.
Batchlets presentation was in 2015, I’ve also seen the documents through Ana Maria Mihalceas substack entitled,
“ National Nanotechnology Initiative Specifically Speaks of Covid 19 Bioweapons As "Nano Technology Enabled" And Plans Many More Nanotechnological "Vaccines" by,
- ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
Although the elitists as you calle them, use subversive terms and language to obfuscate reality, that holds little weight to the documents/evidence that this DOCUMENT BELOW contains - it may assist somehow perhaps in the quest to find a viable and timely solution is what I’d think? Correct me if I’m wrong!
Here’s is the title of the document,
THE NATIONAL
NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE
PRESIDENT'S 2023 BUDGET
Product of the SUBCOMMITTEE ON NANOSCALE SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY
COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY
of the
NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL
February, 2023
And lastly,
A link to the article itself.
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/national-nanotechnology-initiative
🙇♂️ 🥷😎🤓🙏 enjoy!
Do you have the original document source I can't download ? Thank you.
Technically the Pfizer mRNA design would be nanotechnology, but not as complicated as what we are really seeing. So far creating LLM vectors for AI to review the work we already did without telling what we summized it confirmed that it thought it was seeing all the same types of material and self assembly stuff. It concluded in the end that vaccines using mRNA would not look like or have the features shown in all the work I've done so far. It agreed there are complex colloidal networks, lamellar structures, varying lipids, metallic nano particles of hybrid nature and more. All these things were mentioned first on my stack from my research work. We know vaguely what they have done in terms of tech and most of it seems like synthetic biology approach of alteration and nano assembly. Which of course needs no robots. All synthetic or mimetic biology is classed as nanotechnology as much as making gold in a dish using similar constructs or making self-assembling cell structures like lipids and vesicles. I can see why people are confused since others are jumping to conclusions and quoting stuff from all kinds of random tech papers and robots without having seen or observed any of these things closely. So far all materials are assembling via Brownian motion and nothing as yet moves robotically or is shaped like a robot.
Nice and clearly stated !
I do not, I did have it at the time I read the article but must’ve somehow misplaced it here. Ask Ana for it!
Thanks for clarifying what we know so far, everyone is watching, in fact I’ve been following your work now for some time because of Ana.
So,
A brilliant researcher named Brandon Iglesias from substack has this website linked below regarding the removal of what he refers to as “Xi’s Magic Weapon” or,
Wetware spy-bots. He was allegedly targeted with this very system we’re trying to decipher here with all of our work, you included Karl. The problem is it’s outside of anyone who hasn’t worked with this (DOD) technology’s scope.
That being said, if he isn’t lying, then he has made some very considerable strides forward in his research, please see his work!
http://www.electrostasis.com/
🙄 oh dear, tread carefully with this character !😬
Krappykunt? Who are you referring to , perhaps you are unable to be more clear - what “character” are you referencing? Nobody’s talking to you btw, I was speaking to Karl.
Thank you Jason. Ana Maria Mihalceas is brilliant
Hi there, slip of the finger my mistake please disregard 🩷 KK
Yw. I love her, she’s a strong light in these times!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS_6gjEcApo
I will just send you every tech video out there and claim it's evidence for it being used because it exist. My god, why do some of us bother.
🙄🙄🙄
I think partly we see what we're conditioned to see. Isn't this quantum something or other? The observer influences the observed. On a more mundane level, we're told we all seek out articles and writers who will most likely support or write in accordance with our beliefs on any issue like national affairs; economic policies; etc.
I think something along these lines is happening with interpreting what's seen in the blood or substance being analyzed.
I'm also suspicious that the very people who concocted whatever everyone is seeing don't know much about their own research. They put on blinders to manipulate their tiny piece of reality to produce a particular effect. This kind of observation results from a mechanistic framework to interpret the world. Maybe, as some suggested in the comments, once we begin tampering with DNA, which is also light which is also knowledge, sound, and vibration, this technology is far beyond current understanding either in humans or AI.
In looking for a very long time at one of Dr. Nixon's weird slides when he asked his readers what we thought might be happening, it looked to me like the "thing" existed and then didn't exist. In "not existing," it existed still, but it wasn't "there" in visual comprehension. You had to "sense" it. I could "see" it living and breathing.
So, who knows?
Childers column this week referenced a DARPA announcement hiring scientists to study how to get rid of mRNA in the human body such as mRNA acquired via a biologic weapon. I don't think they truly understand anything. They released a half-assed unknown quantity and have no clue how it interacts with the human body. They think they know, but they don't because they're largely driven by ego rather true scientific investigation. The human genetic body is complex, and even mental and emotional responses greatly affect the outcome in disease and illness.
Just a quick question. You mention Dr David Nixon fondly—I am very fond of him too, he like you, is a hero—but my question is, surely you’ve seen his footage of what looks like an arm(?) assembling a structure? I ask because in that video, Dr Nixon calls it a nanobot.
Are we just mincing semantics here? As mentioned above, Carnicom calls it cross domain bacteria, Hildegarde Staninger calls them mesogens.
Hi there we do discuss the most appropriate descriptions of things...robot arms is our affectionate term, we do not know these features to actually be robotic...we question it a lot. We revisit this footage a lot too, it holds clues to something we all see.but dont yet know. Hope this helps you.
I think it's healthy to openly and loosely accept multiple perspectives and not get too entrenched in any specific interpretation. I'm conscious that there's much division within the live blood microscopy world, particularly over the nature of what we're seeing. Divide and conquer to scupper our honest endeavours maybe?
I know that Dr. Ana Mihalcea asserts 'robots' and similar nanotech terminology, based on her reading of industry research papers and particularly the work of Dr. Hildegarde Staninger - and also her clinical observations. It's her personal perspective and professional assertion, which I tend to strongly agree with. However, perhaps she goes too far for many people and asserts a position that cannot yet be tangibly proven. It's an ASSERTION, however, made in good faith, I believe, nothing more. And in dark times of encroaching totalitarian tyranny.
I've often deferred to Dr. Mihalcea for plausible interpretations regarding the 'construction site' micellular formations and the polymer filaments and their approximate possible chemical make-up. I have adopted a similar language to some modest extent in order to explain what I'm seeing. However, I have yet to be persuaded by autonomous robots (the 'generals' as she calls them). I don't see such things robotically meandering in my blood samples - at least that's been my current interpretation as a citizen amateur microscopist. Sometimes they do seem suspiciously robotic and autonomous though. I see them meandering and mechanically moving but am not persuaded (so far) that they are 'robots' - they seem more like synthetic chemistry particle flows.
I think a lot gets lost in translation through the use of nanotech terminology, 'computers' and 'robots' which can mean different things to different people.
I don't think that it's necessarily harmful (in this malevolent nanotech age) to assert the presence of nano/micro 'bots' as a generic description. We need more people to wake up and get involved! People should use their discernment and make up their own minds, agree or disagree. If we have to walk on egg shells (in an already oppressive Orwellian world) in our free expression or assertion of what we honestly think we're seeing under the microscope, we will be self-censoring and tying ourselves in more knots unnecessarily.
Personally, I've often felt guilty for daring to use the term 'Triffids' (in some of my past posts) to humorously (and honestly) describe the polymer filaments found in my blood. It might offend some people as being too light-hearted and trite. It's just poetic license in dire depressing dystopian times to describe the horrors of what we routinely see under the microscope in blood, urine, water and elsewhere.
I suppose inevitably we all form variations of interpretation and differing degrees of assertion as so what we're seeing under the 'scope. It's a big tent we're all in. Surely, we can agree or respectfully disagree on multiple angles and evolving conclusions?
Thanks for all your hard work and dedication, Karl. It is greatly appreciated. I can understand the frustration you must feel from all the differing factions of opinion being expressed, often with angry exasperation and irritation. I'm glad I'm in the slow lane with a mere trickle of subscribers! Best wishes to you. Carry on regardless!
Hey Nigel long time no see.....your last paragraph struck the right chord with me, keep up with the lighter humorous side of it, triffid fan mself. Good to hear from you
Yes, I still quite like the term 'Triffids' as an apt description of the ropey polymer filaments. They do look alien, or botanical twig-like hybrids maybe! Lots of hairy tentacles sprouting out in all directions. Yum! If we don't keep our spontaneous sense of humour we become like the cold callous transhumanist Machine and all things fake, synthetic and coded.
No chance of that happening here 🤪
hy tagios i am in holland but half italian and understand the language do you know the book Application of Quantum dots in biology and medicine?
Jason Whalen (reported for his offensive remarks) see way below
Koppykat
While most intelligent lifeforms saw my general warning comment was directly beneath the person you had just promoted and was non-identifying, non-defamatory yet clear to be wary of based on ppl's own assessment...even the emoji was switched on enough and took notice...
You claim i was interrupting "your" conversation with Karl, where ?! To be clear this is the authors domain, not ours.
Completely unprovoked your true character showed addressing me in the acutely inappropriate
way labelling me using the very language of violent out of control males who subjugate, diminish and destroy women outright.
In this country you can be arrested for use of such an expression considered equal to physical acts of assault, it is the male calling card indicator of utter contempt of women outright, by males who carry out their deaths.
I hope you have a good pair of running shoes on....for when Karl sees this. 🤨 KK
Fairly off-thread. For people buying a microscope for LBA, I suspect my A$500 microscope is worthless for this. We know emfs cause Rouleaux, and looking at a friend's blood, I had about 15 seconds of seeing her rbcs free-floating before they stacked into Rouleaux. I suspect the light source. An LBA using a $25k dark field Olympus did not see my rbcs anywhere near as stacked as my Prism Optical E3.
p.s. The Brisbane rep did say it was no good for RBA after I'd bought it. Lesson: know what questions to ask...
Just an update on the shedding. I have been the canary-in-the-cave for sure on this one. Truly allergic to the 20th century chems and toxins, I have made note it's been a huge time now of no reaction had out in public settings of any effect I have previously had instant (crippling unbearable migraine)
Which is a true gauge of less ppl jabbing at all, or, that phase of attack has played it's part. Weeks ago, there it was so acutely someone sat close by...instant killer migraine uniquely identifiable as per before..struck me down. Exact same reaction. All my siblings jabbed, was deadly affect to even b anywhere near them.
Same crippling migraine. Not there anymore. Glad about it. KK